Cited by 232Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumBirth, Development, and HealthPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Using Natural Disasters to Study the Effects of Prenatal Maternal Stress on Child Health and Development

King, Suzanne, Dancause, Kelsey, Turcotte‐Tremblay, Anne‐Marie, Veru, Franz, Laplante, David P.·2012·Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews

Abstract

Research on the developmental origins of health and disease highlights the plasticity of the human fetus to a host of potential teratogens. Experimental research on laboratory animals has demonstrated a variety of physical and behavioral effects among offspring exposed to prenatal maternal stress (PNMS). However, these studies cannot elucidate the relative effects of the objective stress exposure and the subjective distress in a way that would parallel the stress experience in humans. PNMS research with humans is also limited because there are ethical challenges to designing studies that involve the random assignment of pregnant women to varying levels of independent stressors. Natural disasters present opportunities for natural experiments of the effects of pregnant women's exposure to stress on child development. In this review, we present an overview of the human and animal research on PNMS, and highlight the results of Project Ice Storm which has been following the cognitive, behavioral, motor and physical development of children exposed in utero to the January 1998 Quebec Ice Storm. We have found that both objective degree of exposure to the storm and the mothers' subjective distress have strong and persistent effects on child development, and that these effects are often moderated by the timing of the ice storm in pregnancy and by the child's sex. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 96:273–288, 2012. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bdrc.21026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 232

Authors
King, S., Dancause, K., Turcotte‐Tremblay, A., Veru, F., & Laplante, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
King, Suzanne
Venue
Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
273-288
ISSN
  • 1542-975X (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-9768
OpenAlex
W1554567961
Cited by
232
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Birth Defects Research Part C Embryo Today Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP111177, MOP79424, 57849_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
prenatal stress, natural disasters, developmental origins of health and disease, child development, maternal distress, teratogens, sex differences, cognitive development, behavioral development, motor development, physical development
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Child Welfare, Cognition, Disasters, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Quebec, Stress, Physiological, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review