The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combining near- and far-field exposure for an organ-specific and whole-body RF-EMF proxy for epidemiological research: a reference case
Abstract
A framework for the combination of near‐field (NF) and far‐field (FF) radio frequency electromagnetic exposure sources to the average organ and whole‐body specific absorption rates (SARs) is presented. As a reference case, values based on numerically derived SARs for whole‐body and individual organs and tissues are combined with realistic exposure data, which have been collected using personal exposure meters during the Swiss Qualifex study. The framework presented can be applied to any study region where exposure data is collected by appropriate measurement equipment. Based on results derived from the data for the region of Basel, Switzerland, the relative importance of NF and FF sources to the personal exposure is examined for three different study groups. The results show that a 24‐h whole‐body averaged exposure of a typical mobile phone user is dominated by the use of his or her own mobile phone when a Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) 900 or GSM 1800 phone is used. If only Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) phones are used, the user would experience a lower exposure level on average caused by the lower average output power of UMTS phones. Data presented clearly indicate the necessity of collecting band‐selective exposure data in epidemiological studies related to electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 34:366–374, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the average output power of cordless phone is 1–2 order of magnitude less than that from 1G to 2G mobile phones (Lauer et al., 2013)”
From The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A systematic review of human observational studies - Part I: Most researched outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as Lauer et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1109/TMTT.2003.808695 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N01 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/55/7/001 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/001 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2009.04.015 · DOI
- 10.1109/TWC.2009.12.080758 · DOI
- 10.1109/TEMC.2011.2139216 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/54/4/004 · DOI
- 10.1109/TBME.2002.807639 · DOI
- Mohler E, 2009, Personal exposure to high‐frequency electromagnetic fields in the region of Basel (Switzerland): An overview of the Qualifex study, Umweltmed Forsch Prax, 14, 329
- 10.1002/bem.20298 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.HP.0000298816.66888.05 · DOI
- 10.1136/oem.2008.043380 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Telecommunication devices use, screen time and sleep in adolescents
Cabré-Riera, A., Torrent, M., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Vrijheid, M., Cardis, E., & Guxens, M. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.036 · Cited by 115
Karipidis, K., Baaken, D., Loney, T., Blettner, M., Brzozek, C., Elwood, M., Narh, C., Orsini, N., Röösli, M., Paulo, M. S., et al. (2024) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983 · Cited by 58
Self-citationBosch-Capblanch, X., Esu, E., Oringanje, C. M., Dongus, S., Jalilian, H., Eyers, J., Auer, C., Meremikwu, M., & Röösli, M. (2024) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108612 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauer, O., Frei, P., Gosselin, M., Joseph, W., Röösli, M., & Fröhlich, J.
- Venue
- Bioelectromagnetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-15
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 366-374
- ISSN
- 0197-8462
- 1521-186X
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review