Cited by 21Electromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsEffects of Radiation ExposureMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications

Effects of millimeter‐wave radiation on monolayer cell cultures. III. A search for frequency‐specific athermal biological effects on protein synthesis

Bush, L. G., Hill, D. W., Riazi, A., Stensaas, L. J., Partlow, L. M., Gandhi, O. P.·1981·Bioelectromagnetics

Abstract

A method recently developed in this laboratory has been used to directly expose BHK‐21/C13 cells to high levels of microwave radiation without significant microwave‐induced heating (⩽ 0.1 °C). Monolayer cultures were grown on microwave‐transparent polystyrene coverslips, placed on the open end of a wave guide, and maintained at 37.2 °C during irradiation at frequencies in both the E‐ and U‐bands (average power densities 292 and 177 mW/cm 2, respectively). Effects of microwave radiation were assessed at 0.1 GHz increments in the ranges of 38–48 GHz and 65–75 GHz. Protein synthesis was measured in quadruplicate cultures that were allowed to incorporate labeled methionine during the 15‐minute period of microwave irradiation. Autoradiographs of each monolayer culture were scanned along the region corresponding to the longer axis of the wave guide aperture using a microdensitometer to quantify incorporation. Since microwave power incident on the cells was previously shown to vary along this axis according to a cosine 2 relationship from zero at each edge of the wave guide to twice the average power density at the center of the wave guide, this technique should reveal biological effects that might only be manifested in narrow amplitude domains or “power windows.” Observations of protein synthesis in monolayer cultures irradiated at 202 closely spaced frequencies in the E‐ and U‐bands failed to reveal changes associated with microwave exposure. Thus no evidence was obtained in support of the existence of frequency‐specific athermal biological effects of microwaves. In addition, no support was found for the existence of amplitude‐specific “power windows”.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bem.2250020206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bush, L. G., Hill, D. W., Riazi, A., Stensaas, L. J., Partlow, L. M., & Gandhi, O. P.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Bush, L. G.
Venue
Bioelectromagnetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
151-159
ISSN
  • 0197-8462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-186X
OpenAlex
W2048487166
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioelectromagnetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Microwave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
millimeter-wave emission, microwave irradiation, protein synthesis, BHK-21 cells, E-band, U-band, power windows, power density distribution, methionine incorporation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Cricetinae, Hot Temperature, Kidney, Microwaves, Protein Biosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review