The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses
Abstract
A simple electrical model for biological cells predicts an increasing probability for electric field interactions with cell substructures of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells when the electric pulse duration is reduced into the sub‐microsecond range. The validity of this hypothesis was verified experimentally by applying electrical pulses with electric field intensities of up to 5.3 MV/m to human eosinophils in vitro. When 3–5 pulses of 60 ns duration were applied to human eosinophils, intracellular granules were modified without permanent disruption of the plasma membrane. In spite of the extreme electrical power levels applied to the cells thermal effects could be neglected because of the ultrashort pulse duration. The intracellular effect extends conventional electroporation to cellular substructures and opens the potential for new applications in apoptosis induction, gene delivery to the nucleus, or altered cell functions, depending on the electrical pulse conditions. Bioelectromagnetics 22:440–448, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ackerman, S. J., Loegering, D. A., Venge, P., Olsson, I., Harley, J. B., Fauci, A. S., & Gleich, G. J. (1983) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.131.6.2977 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Electroporation-Based Technologies for Medicine: Principles, Applications, and Challenges
Yarmush, M. L., Golberg, A., Serša, G., Kotnik, T., & Miklavčič, D. (2014) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104622 · Cited by 889
Membrane Electroporation and Electropermeabilization: Mechanisms and Models
Kotnik, T., Rems, L., Tarek, M., & Miklavčič, D. (2019) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115451 · Cited by 813
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Nanosecond pulsed electric fields cause melanomas to self-destruct
Nuccitelli, R., Pliquett, U., Chen, X., Ford, W., James Swanson, R., Beebe, S. J., Kolb, J. F., & Schoenbach, K. H. (2006) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.02.181 · Cited by 512
Self-citationNanosecond, high‐intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells
Beebe, S. J., Fox, P. M., Rec, L. J., Willis, L. K., & Schoenbach, K. H. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0859fje · Cited by 465
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoenbach, K. H., Beebe, S. J., & Buescher, E. S.
- Venue
- Bioelectromagnetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 440-448
- ISSN
- 0197-8462 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-186X
- OpenAlex
- W2146526868
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bem.71
- The paper
- Schoenbach, K. H., Beebe, S. J., & Buescher, E. S. (2001). Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses. Bioelectromagnetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.71
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.