A four‐stage longitudinal study exploring pupils’ experiences, preparation and support systems during primary–secondary school transitions
Open accessAbstract
A longitudinal study was conducted over four stages of three school years across the primary – secondary transition. The purpose was to understand the dynamic transition experience of pupils, investigate the effectiveness of preparation by schools to support transitions and understand pupils’ most important support networks. Using online questionnaires, data were collected from pupils at four time points, twice from secondary school professionals and their parents, and once from primary school professionals. Results highlight the ongoing and dynamic nature of transitions. What pupils were excited about were still seen to be good once they were in secondary school , and aspects that worried them declined over time. Some pupils experienced problems and adapted at different times, whereas for some, problems emerged later. It seems that those who anticipated problems when in primary school were more likely to experience problems; this has implications for the discourse around transitions and its impact on pupils’ anticipation of transition experience. Although transition planning and preparation by schools were important and varied, they were not always effective, not provided in a timely manner and did not tap into their naturally occurring support networks in the home and community. This study makes unique contributions in terms of highlighting the dynamic transitions process and change in pupils’ experience over time; various aspects of transitions that children are excited and concerned about and how these changed over time; professionals’ conceptualisations of transitions; pupils’ and parents’ views of the effectiveness of transition practices at various stages; and pupils’ real support networks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Few existing studies ask children a direct question about their transition experiences.
“Few existing studies (e.g., Jindal-Snape & Cantali, 2019) ask children a direct question about their transition experiences.”
From Primary–secondary school transition experiences and factors associated with differences in these experiences: Analysis of the longitudinal Growing Up in Scotland dataset (2023) · cites this paper as Jindal-Snape & Cantali, 2019
The resulting proportions who experienced positive or negative transitions via these cut-offs are broadly in line with observations from previous studies.
“The resulting proportions who experienced positive or negative transitions via these cut-offs are broadly in line with observations from previous studies (Jindal-Snape & Cantali, 2019;Waters et al., 2014a).”
From Primary–secondary school transition experiences and factors associated with differences in these experiences: Analysis of the longitudinal Growing Up in Scotland dataset (2023) · cites this paper as Jindal-Snape & Cantali, 2019
The available passages describe pupils’ changing experiences of transition (1 Media contribution, no page) but give no proportions for positive or negative transitions. Searches for percentages, cut-offs, and successful or challenging transitions found no passage that would establish whether the citing paper’s proportions are broadly in line with this study. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Jindal‐Snape, D., & Cantali, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jindal‐Snape, Divya
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-19
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1255-1278
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W2964161998
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- British Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
- Keywords
- transition to secondary school, transition experiences, transition preparation, transition planning, anticipatory anxiety, parents' views
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review