Cited by 69Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducational Environments and Student OutcomesSociology and Education Studies

A four‐stage longitudinal study exploring pupils’ experiences, preparation and support systems during primary–secondary school transitions

Open access
Jindal‐Snape, Divya, Cantali, Dianne·2019·British Educational Research Journal

Abstract

A longitudinal study was conducted over four stages of three school years across the primary – secondary transition. The purpose was to understand the dynamic transition experience of pupils, investigate the effectiveness of preparation by schools to support transitions and understand pupils’ most important support networks. Using online questionnaires, data were collected from pupils at four time points, twice from secondary school professionals and their parents, and once from primary school professionals. Results highlight the ongoing and dynamic nature of transitions. What pupils were excited about were still seen to be good once they were in secondary school , and aspects that worried them declined over time. Some pupils experienced problems and adapted at different times, whereas for some, problems emerged later. It seems that those who anticipated problems when in primary school were more likely to experience problems; this has implications for the discourse around transitions and its impact on pupils’ anticipation of transition experience. Although transition planning and preparation by schools were important and varied, they were not always effective, not provided in a timely manner and did not tap into their naturally occurring support networks in the home and community. This study makes unique contributions in terms of highlighting the dynamic transitions process and change in pupils’ experience over time; various aspects of transitions that children are excited and concerned about and how these changed over time; professionals’ conceptualisations of transitions; pupils’ and parents’ views of the effectiveness of transition practices at various stages; and pupils’ real support networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/berj.3561

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 69

Authors
Jindal‐Snape, D., & Cantali, D.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Jindal‐Snape, Divya
Venue
British Educational Research Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-19
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1255-1278
ISSN
  • 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3518
OpenAlex
W2964161998
Cited by
69
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
Keywords
transition to secondary school, transition experiences, transition preparation, transition planning, anticipatory anxiety, parents' views

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review