Feeling voice: The emotional politics of ‘student voice’ for teachers
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, student voice has become a popular school reform strategy, with the promise of generating relations of trust, respect, belonging and student empowerment. However, when student voice practices are taken up by schools, student voice may also be associated with less affirmative feelings: it is often accounted for in terms of teacher ‘fear’, ‘resistance’ or ‘uncertainty’ about altered power relations. Such explanations risk individualising and pathologising teachers’ responses, rather than recognising the complexities of the institutional conditions of student voice. This article considers the affective politics of student voice: that is, the contestations that attend who gets to name how student voice feels in schools. Working with data from an evaluation study of three Australian primary schools who engage in ‘exemplary’ student voice practices, we listen to school leaders and facilitating teachers’ accounts about the responses of other teachers at their schools to student voice. Parallels are drawn between the construction of some teachers as reluctant, and previous analyses of ‘silenced’ student voices in schools. We argue that, in order to analyse the enactment of student voice in more nuanced tones, it is necessary to consider the profoundly emotional experience of teaching and learning, the ambivalences of teachers’ experiences of student voice and contemporary reconstitutions of teacher subjectivities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Qualitative research has found that students do not always speak up when invited and teachers do not always listen and adjust their practice accordingly.
“Qualitative research has found that this is not always the case (Black & Mayes, 2020; Thomson, 2011).”
From How teachers’ student voice practices affect student engagement and achievement: exploring choice, receptivity, and responsiveness to student voice as moderators (2025) · cites this paper as Black & Mayes, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Black, R., & Mayes, E.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Black, Rosalyn
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1064-1080
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W3009901715
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- British Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- student voice, emotions in politics, teacher emotions, teacher subjectivity, educational reform, power relations in schools, teacher resistance, elementary school, school leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review