Sorting out Sox10 functions in neural crest development
Abstract
For both vertebrate developmental and evolutionary biologists, and also for clinicians, the neural crest (NC) is a fundamental cell population. An understanding of Sox10 function in NC development is of particular significance since Sox10 mutations underlie several neurocristopathies. Surprisingly, experiments in different model organisms aimed at identifying Sox10's role(s) have suggested at least four distinct functions. Sox10 may be critical for formation of neural crest cells (NCCs), maintaining multipotency of crest cells, specification of derivative cell fates from these cells and their differentiation. Here, I discuss this controversy and argue that these functions are, in part, molecularly interrelated. BioEssays 28: 788–798, 2006. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In sox10 mutants, NCCs become trapped in the Cbl state.
“In sox10 mutants, we suggest that NCCs become trapped in the Cbl state, since specification to all non-ectomesenchymal fates is blocked [9], [26], [52].”
From A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
Cites
The transcription factor Sox9 is required for cranial neural crest development in<i>Xenopus</i>
Spokony, R. F., Aoki, Y., Saint-Germain, N., Magner-Fink, E., & Saint-Jeannet, J.-P. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.2.421 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petratou, K., Subkhankulova, T., Lister, J. A., Rocco, A., Schwetlick, H., & Kelsh, R. N. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007402 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationAn ongoing role for<i>Wnt</i>signaling in differentiating melanocytes in vivo
Vibert, L., Aquino, G., Gehring, I., Subkankulova, T., Schilling, T. F., Rocco, A., & Kelsh, R. N. (2017) · Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research · doi:10.1111/pcmr.12568 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kelsh, R. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kelsh, Robert N.
- ORCID
- Kelsh, Robert N.
- Venue
- BioEssays
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 788-798
- ISSN
- 0265-9247 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-1878
- OpenAlex
- W2065367452
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BioEssays (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
- Keywords
- SOX10, neural crest development, neural crest cells, neurocristopathy, multipotency, cell fate specification, cell differentiation, vertebrate evolution, model organisms
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, High Mobility Group Proteins, Humans, Models, Neurological, Mutation, Neural Crest, Neuroglia, Phenotype, Stem Cells, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, SOXE Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review