The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reactive oxygen species generation and human spermatozoa: The balance of benefit and risk
Abstract
Although the generation of reactive oxygen species is an activity normally associated with phagocytic leucocytes, mammalian spermatozoa were, in fact, the first cell type in which this activity was described. In recent years it has become apparent that spermatozoa are not the only nonphagocytic cells to exhibit a capacity for reactive oxygen species production, because this activity has been detected in a wide variety of different cells including fibroblasts, mesangial cells, oocytes, Leyding cells endothelial cells, thryroid cells, adipocytes, tumour cell and platelets. Since the capacity to generate reactive oxygen species is apparently so widespread, the risk‐benefit equation for these potentially pernicious molecules becomes a matter of intese interest. In the case of human spermatozoa, the risk of manufacturing reactive oxygen metabolites is considerable because these cells are particularly vulnerable to lipid peroxidation. Indeed, there is now good evidence to indicate that oxygen radicals are involved in the initiation of peroxidative damage to the sperm plasma membrane, seen in many cases of male infertility. This risk is off‐set by recent data suggesting that superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide also participate in the induction of key biological events such as hyperactiavated motility and the acrosome reaction. Thus, human spermatozoa appear to use reactive oxygen species for a physiological purpose and have the difficult task of ensuring the balanced generation of these potentially harmful, but biologically important, modulators of cellular function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology
Bedard, K., & Krause, K.-H. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00044.2005 · Cited by 6,989
“Since then, the generation of ROS by sperm has been demonstrated in a large number of species tested (17, 49, 267, 572).”
BackgroundA Ca2+-activated NADPH Oxidase in Testis, Spleen, and Lymph Nodes
Bánfi, B., Molnár, G., Maturana, A., Steger, K., Hegedûs, B., Demaurex, N., & Krause, K.-H. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m103034200 · Cited by 622
The importance of folate, zinc and antioxidants in the pathogenesis and prevention of subfertility
Ebisch, I. M. W., Thomas, C. M. G., Peters, W. H. M., Braat, D. D. M., & Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. M. (2007) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml054 · Cited by 503
Ollero, M., Gil-Guzman, E., Lopez, M. C., Sharma, R. K., Agarwal, A., Larson, K., Evenson, D., Thomas, A. J., & Alvarez, J. G. (2001) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/16.9.1912 · Cited by 392
Gil-Guzman, E., Ollero, M., Lopez, M. C., Sharma, R. K., Alvarez, J. G., Thomas, A. J., & Agarwal, A. (2001) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/16.9.1922 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Aitken, J., & Fisher, H.
- Venue
- BioEssays
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 259-267
- ISSN
- 0265-9247 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-1878
- OpenAlex
- W1996944297
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reactive oxygen species generation and human spermatozoa: The balance of benefit and risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bies.950160409
- The paper
- Aitken, J., & Fisher, H. (1994). Reactive oxygen species generation and human spermatozoa: The balance of benefit and risk. BioEssays. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950160409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.