The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Youden Index and the Optimal Cut‐Point Corrected for Measurement Error
Abstract
Random measurement error can attenuate a biomarker's ability to discriminate between diseased and non‐diseased populations. A global measure of biomarker effectiveness is the Youden index, the maximum difference between sensitivity, the probability of correctly classifying diseased individuals, and 1‐specificity, the probability of incorrectly classifying health individuals. We present an approach for estimating the Youden index and associated optimal cut‐point for a normally distributed biomarker that corrects for normally distributed random measurement error. We also provide confidence intervals for these corrected estimates using the delta method and coverage probability through simulation over a variety of situations. Applying these techniques to the biomarker thiobarbituric acid reaction substance (TBARS), a measure of sub‐products of lipid peroxidation that has been proposed as a discriminating measurement for cardiovascular disease, yields a 50% increase in diagnostic effectiveness at the optimal cut‐point. This result may lead to biomarkers that were once naively considered ineffective becoming useful diagnostic devices. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979) · doi:10.4135/9781412985642 · Cited by 5,884
Cited by
Perkins, N. J., & Schisterman, E. F. (2006) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwj063 · Cited by 1,759
Self-citationRuopp, M. D., Perkins, N. J., Whitcomb, B. W., & Schisterman, E. F. (2008) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200710415 · Cited by 1,320
Self-citationChicco, D., Tötsch, N., & Jurman, G. (2021) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/s13040-021-00244-z · Cited by 893
Jiménez‐Valverde, A. (2012) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00683.x · Cited by 803
Defining an Optimal Cut-Point Value in ROC Analysis: An Alternative Approach
Unal, I. (2017) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2017/3762651 · Cited by 789
Metadata
- Authors
- Perkins, N. J., & Schisterman, E. F.
- Venue
- Biometrical Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 428-441
- ISSN
- 0323-3847 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4036
- OpenAlex
- W2134268004
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Youden Index and the Optimal Cut‐Point Corrected for Measurement Error. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bimj.200410133
- The paper
- Perkins, N. J., & Schisterman, E. F. (2005). The Youden Index and the Optimal Cut‐Point Corrected for Measurement Error. Biometrical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200410133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.