The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated GFP Knock‐in at the MAP1LC3B Locus in 293FT Cells Is Better for Bona Fide Monitoring Cellular Autophagy
Abstract
Accurately identifying and quantifying cellular autophagy is very important as the significance of autophagy in physiological and pathological processes becomes increasingly evident. Ectopically expressed fluorescent‐tagged microtubule‐associated protein light chain 3B (MAP1LC3B, LC3) is the most widely used reporter for monitoring autophagy activity thus far. However, this approach ignores the influence of constitutively overexpressed LC3 on autophagy itself and autophagy‐related processes and its accuracy in indicating autophagy is questionable. Here, we generated a knock‐in GFP‐LC3 reporter via the CRISPR/Cas9 system in 293FT cells to add GFP to the N‐terminal of and in frame with endogenous LC3. We proved that this knock‐in GFP‐LC3 was expressed at biological level driven by the endogenous transcriptional regulatory elements as the wild type alleles. Compared with the ectopically expressed GFP‐LC3, the endogenous knock‐in reporter exhibited much higher sensitivity and signal‐to‐noise ratio of GFP‐LC3 puncta upon the induction or inhibition of autophagy at certain step for monitoring autophagy activity. Thus, according to the previous reported concerning and the results presented here, we suggest that this knock‐in GFP‐LC3 reporter is better for bona fide monitoring cellular autophagy and should be employed for further study of autophagy in vitro and in vivo.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Spot function in Imaris automatically locates and enumerates autophagosomes within individual cells based on size and intensity thresholds [404, 405].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [405]
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Self-citationKuma, A., Matsui, M., & Mizushima, N. (2007) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.4012 · Cited by 555
Regulation of the autophagic machinery in human neutrophils
Mitroulis, I., Kourtzelis, I., Kambas, K., Rafail, S., Chrysanthopoulou, A., Speletas, M., & Ritis, K. (2010) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200940025 · Cited by 132
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1126/science.1099993 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09782 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.151.2.263 · DOI
- 10.1038/35044114 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0704 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/path.2694 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aad5227 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-60761-753-2_15 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/auto.6360 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0047 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-015-2104-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/onc.2008.117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15592294.2016.1144007 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0704 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M702824200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng1362 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/auto.5.4.7768 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI40027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aad5227 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M404399200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/auto.6360 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.7.2.14181 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Z., Zhao, J., Qiu, M., Mi, Z., Meng, M., Guo, Y., Wang, H., & Yuan, Z.
- Affiliations
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060 China
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Basic Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Tianjin 300070 China
- Department of general surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China
- ORCID
- Wu, Zhiqiang
- Venue
- Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1860-6768
- 1860-7314
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81502660, 81472797)
- Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (16JCQNJC10000, 17JCQNJC10600)
- Tianjin Medical University (2015KYZQ09)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review