The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme
Abstract
An extension of the new computational methodology for drug design, the “relaxed complex” method (J.‐H. Lin, A. L. Perryman, J. R. Schames, and J. A. McCammon, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002, vol. 24, pp. 5632–5633), which accommodates receptor flexibility, is described. This relaxed complex method recognizes that ligand may bind to conformations that occur only rarely in the dynamics of the receptor. We have shown that the ligand–enzyme binding modes are very sensitive to the enzyme conformations, and our approach is capable of finding the best ligand enzyme complexes. Rapid docking serves as an efficient initial filtering method to screen a myriad of docking modes to a limited set, and it is then followed by more accurate scoring with the MM/PBSA (Molecular Mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area) approach to find the best ligand–receptor complexes. The MM/PBSA scorings consistently indicate that the calculated binding modes that are most similar to those observed in the x‐ray crystallographic complexes are the ones with the lowest free energies. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 68: 47–62, 2003
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Cited by
Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design
Alonso, H., Bliznyuk, A. A., & Gready, J. E. (2006) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.20067 · Cited by 759
Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21214 · Cited by 401
Molecular Docking Screens Using Comparative Models of Proteins
Fan, H., Irwin, J. J., Webb, B. M., Klebe, G., Shoichet, B. K., & Sali, A. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci9003706 · Cited by 135
Protein flexibility in drug discovery: from theory to computation.
Buonfiglio, R., Recanatini, M., & Masetti, M. (2015) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.201500086 · Cited by 73
Robust scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions with quantum chemical charge models.
Wang, J.-C., Lin, J.-H., Chen, C.-M., Perryman, A. L., & Olson, A. J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200220v · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, J., Perryman, A. L., Schames, J. R., & McCammon, J. A.
- Venue
- Biopolymers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11-25
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-62
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0282
- OpenAlex
- W2003127541
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.10218
- The paper
- Lin, J., Perryman, A. L., Schames, J. R., & McCammon, J. A. (2003). The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. Biopolymers. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.10218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.