The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An optimized potential function for the calculation of nucleic acid interaction energies I. Base stacking
Abstract
An optimized potential function for base‐stacking interaction is constructed. Stacking energies between the complementary pairs of a dimer are calculated as a function of the rotational angle and separation distance. Using several different sets of atomic charges, the electrostatic component in the monopole‐monopole approximation (MMA) is compared to the more refined segmented multipole–multipole representation (SMMA); the general features of the stacking minima are found to be correctly reproduced with IEHT or CNDO atomic charges. The electrostatic component is observed to control the location of stacking minima. The MMA, in general, is not a reliable approximation of the SMMA in regions away from minima; however, the MMA is reliable in predicting the location and nature of stacking minima. The attractive part of the Lennard‐Jones 6–12 potential is compared to and parameterized against the expression for the second‐order interaction terms composed of multipole‐bond polarizability for the polarization energy and transition‐dipole bond polarizabilities for approximation of the dispersion energy. The repulsive part of the Lennard‐Jones potential is compared to a Kitaygorodski‐type repulsive function; changing the exponent from its usual value of 12 to 11.7 gives significantly better agreement with the more refined repulsive function. Stacking minima calculated with the optimized potential method are compared with various perturbation‐type treatments. The optimized potential method yields results that compare as well with melting data as do any of the more recent and expensive perturbation methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element
Kim, J. L., Nikolov, D. B., & Burley, S. K. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365520a0 · Cited by 1,048
Biochemical Basis of DNA Replication Fidelity
Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., Petruska, J., & Kunkel, T. A. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239309086792 · Cited by 446
Factors Contributing to Aromatic Stacking in Water: Evaluation in the Context of DNA
Guckian, K. M., Schweitzer, B. A., Ren, R. X.-F., Sheils, C. J., Tahmassebi, D. C., & Kool, E. T. (2000) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9934854 · Cited by 434
Inferring Horizontal Gene Transfer
Ravenhall, M., Škunca, N., Lassalle, F., & Dessimoz, C. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004095 · Cited by 296
Hydrophobic, Non-Hydrogen-Bonding Bases and Base Pairs in DNA
Schweitzer, B. A., & Kool, E. T. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00112a001 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Ornstein, R. L., Rein, R., Breen, D. L., & Macelroy, R. D.
- Venue
- Biopolymers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2341-2360
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0282
- OpenAlex
- W1997481046
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An optimized potential function for the calculation of nucleic acid interaction energies I. Base stacking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.1978.360171005
- The paper
- Ornstein, R. L., Rein, R., Breen, D. L., & Macelroy, R. D. (1978). An optimized potential function for the calculation of nucleic acid interaction energies I. Base stacking. Biopolymers. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1978.360171005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.