Prediction of antimicrobial peptides based on the adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system application
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are widely distributed defense molecules and represent a promising alternative for solving the problem of antibiotic resistance. Nevertheless, the experimental time required to screen putative AMPs makes computational simulations based on peptide sequence analysis and/or molecular modeling extremely attractive. Artificial intelligence methods acting as simulation and prediction tools are of great importance in helping to efficiently discover and design novel AMPs. In the present study, state‐of‐the‐art published outcomes using different prediction methods and databases were compared to an adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model. Data from our study showed that ANFIS obtained an accuracy of 96.7% and a Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.936, which proved it to be an efficient model for pattern recognition in antimicrobial peptide prediction. Furthermore, a lower number of input parameters were needed for the ANFIS model, improving the speed and ease of prediction. In summary, due to the fuzzy nature of AMP physicochemical properties, the ANFIS approach presented here can provide an efficient solution for screening putative AMP sequences and for exploration of properties characteristic of AMPs. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 98: 280–287, 2012.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The amphipathic profile of Cn-AMP1 seems important for interaction with the cell surface.
“This moment defines the amphipathic peptide profile, which seems to be important for interaction with the cell surface, as previously described, together with other multiple factors that included aggregation and charges [29].”
From Structural insights into <i>Cn</i>‐AMP1, a short disulfide‐free multifunctional peptide from green coconut water (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Fernandes, F. C., Rigden, D. J., & Franco, O. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Católica de Brasília (BR)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- ORCID
- Rigden, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Peptide Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 280-287
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976178947
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biopolymers (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- antimicrobial peptides, antimicrobial peptide prediction, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, peptide sequence analysis, antibiotic resistance, pattern recognition
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Anti-Infective Agents, Artificial Intelligence, Peptides, Fuzzy Logic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review