Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

High‐cell‐density fed‐batch cultivation of the docosahexaenoic acid producing marine alga Crypthecodinium cohnii

Open access
De Swaaf, Martin E., Sijtsma, Lolke, Pronk, Jack T.·2003·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

The heterotrophic marine alga Crypthecodinium cohnii is known to produce docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a polyunsaturated fatty acid with food and pharmaceutical applications, during batch cultivation on complex media containing sea salt, yeast extract, and glucose. In the present study, fed‐batch cultivation was studied as an alternative fermentation strategy for DHA production. Glucose and acetic acid were compared as carbon sources. For both substrates, the feed rate was adapted to the maximum specific consumption rate of C. cohnii. In glucose‐grown cultures, this was done by maintaining a significant glucose concentration (between 5 and 20 g/L) throughout fermentation. In acetic acid‐grown cultures, the medium feed was automatically controlled via the culture pH. A feed consisting of acetic acid (50% w/w) resulted in a higher overall volumetric productivity of DHA (rDHA) than a feed consisting of 50% (w/v) glucose (38 and 14 mg/L/h, respectively). The rDHA was further increased to 48 mg/L/h using a feed consisting of pure acetic acid. The latter fermentation strategy resulted in final concentrations of 109 g/L dry biomass, 61 g/L lipid, and 19 g/L DHA. These are the highest biomass, lipid, and DHA concentrations reported to date for a heterotrophic alga. Vigorous mixing was required to sustain aerobic conditions during high‐cell‐density cultivation. This was complicated by culture viscosity, which resulted from the production of viscous extracellular polysaccharides. These may present a problem for large‐scale industrial production of DHA. Addition of a commercial polysaccharide‐hydrolase preparation could decrease the viscosity of the culture and the required stirring. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 81: 666–672, 2003.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.10513

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
De Swaaf, M. E., Sijtsma, L., & Pronk, J. T.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-10
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
666-672
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2085841152
Cited by
259
References
0
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐cell‐density fed‐batch cultivation of the docosahexaenoic acid producing marine alga Crypthecodinium cohnii. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.10513
The paper
De Swaaf, M. E., Sijtsma, L., & Pronk, J. T. (2003). High‐cell‐density fed‐batch cultivation of the docosahexaenoic acid producing marine alga Crypthecodinium cohnii. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10513

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.