The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential gene expression shows natural brominated furanones interfere with the autoinducer‐2 bacterial signaling system of Escherichia coli
Abstract
The quorum sensing disrupter ( 5Z )‐4‐bromo‐5‐(bromomethylene)‐3‐butyl‐2( 5H )‐furanone (furanone) of the alga Delisea pulchra was previously found by us ( Environ Microbiol 3:731–736, 2001) to inhibit quorum sensing in Escherichia coli via autoinducer‐2 (AI‐2, produced by LuxS). In this study, DNA microarrays were used to study the genetic basis of this natural furanone inhibition of AI‐2 signaling (significant values with p < 0.05 are reported). Using DNA microarrays, the AI‐2 mutant Escherichia coli DH5α was compared with the AI‐2 wild‐type strain, E. coli K12, to determine how AI‐2 influenced gene expression. Escherichia coli K12 was also grown with 0 and 60 μg/mL furanone to study the inhibition of quorum sensing gene expression. It was found that 166 genes were differentially expressed by AI‐2 (67 were induced and 99 were repressed) and 90 genes were differentially expressed by furanone (34 were induced and 56 were repressed). Importantly, 79% (44 out of 56) of the genes repressed by furanone were induced by AI‐2, which indicated that furanone inhibited AI‐2 signaling and influenced the same suite of genes as a regulon . Most of these genes have functions of chemotaxis, motility, and flagellar synthesis. Interestingly, the aerotaxis genes aer and tsr were discovered to be induced by AI‐2 and repressed by furanone. Representative microarray results were confirmed by RNA dot blotting. Furthermore, the E. coli air–liquid interface biofilm formation was repressed by furanone, supporting the results that taxis and flagellar genes were repressed by furanone. The autoinducer bioassay indicated that 100 μg/mL furanone decreased the extracellular concentration of AI‐2 2‐fold, yet luxS and pfs transcription were not significantly altered. Hence, furanone appeared to alter AI‐2 signaling post‐transcriptionally. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities
Lee, J.-H., & Lee, J. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00204.x · Cited by 1,059
Galloway, W. R. J. D., Hodgkinson, J. T., Bowden, S. D., Welch, M., & Spring, D. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100109t · Cited by 665
Beloin, C., Roux, A., & Ghigo, J. M. (2008) · Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_12 · Cited by 578
González Barrios, A. F., Zuo, R., Hashimoto, Y., Yang, L., Bentley, W. E., & Wood, T. K. (2006) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.188.1.305-316.2006 · Cited by 549
Self-citationQuorum sensing and bacterial biofilms
Dickschat, J. S. (2010) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b804469b · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, D., Bedzyk, L. A., Ye, R. W., Thomas, S. M., & Wood, T. K.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 630-642
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2096222925
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential gene expression shows natural brominated furanones interfere with the autoinducer‐2 bacterial signaling system of Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.20259
- The paper
- Ren, D., Bedzyk, L. A., Ye, R. W., Thomas, S. M., & Wood, T. K. (2004). Differential gene expression shows natural brominated furanones interfere with the autoinducer‐2 bacterial signaling system of Escherichia coli. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.