The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anaerobic biodegradation of oleic and palmitic acids: Evidence of mass transfer limitations caused by long chain fatty acid accumulation onto the anaerobic sludge
Open accessAbstract
Palmitic acid was the main long chain fatty acids (LCFA) that accumulated onto the anaerobic sludge when oleic acid was fed to an EGSB reactor. The conversion between oleic and palmitic acid was linked to the biological activity. When palmitic acid was fed to an EGSB reactor it represented also the main LCFA that accumulated onto the sludge. The way of palmitic acid accumulation was different in the oleic and in the palmitic acid fed reactors. When oleic acid was fed, the biomass‐associated LCFA (83% as palmitic acid) were mainly adsorbed and entrapped in the sludge that became “encapsulated” by an LCFA layer. However, when palmitic acid was fed, the biomass‐associated LCFA (the totality as palmitic acid) was mainly precipitated in white spots like precipitates in between the sludge, which remained “non‐encapsulated.” The two sludges were compared in terms of the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) in the presence of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and H 2 CO 2, before and after the mineralization of similar amounts of biomass‐associated LCFA (4.6 and 5.2 g COD‐LCFA/g of volatile suspended solids (VSS), for the oleic and palmitic acid fed sludge, respectively). The “non‐encapsulated,” sludge exhibited a considerable initial methanogenic activity on all the tested substrates, with the single exception of butyrate. However, with the “encapsulated” sludge only methane production from ethanol and H 2/CO 2 was detected, after a lag phase of about 50 h. After mineralization of the biomass‐associated LCFA, both sludges exhibited activities of similar order of magnitude in the presence of the same individual substrates and significantly higher than before. The results evidenced that LCFA accumulation onto the sludge can create a physical barrier and hinder the transfer of substrates and products, inducing a delay on the initial methane production. Whatever the mechanism, metabolic or physical, that is behind this inhibition, it is reversible, being eliminated after the depletion of the biomass‐associated LCFA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: A review
Chen, J. L., Ortiz, R., Steele, T. W. J., & Stuckey, D. C. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.005 · Cited by 586
Tambone, F., Scaglia, B., D’Imporzano, G., Schievano, A., Orzi, V., Salati, S., & Adani, F. (2010) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.034 · Cited by 527
Chow, W., Chong, S., Lim, J., Chan, Y., Chong, M., Tiong, T., Chin, J., & Pan, G.-T. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr8010039 · Cited by 194
Czatzkowska, M., Harnisz, M., Korzeniewska, E., & Koniuszewska, I. (2020) · Energy Science & Engineering · doi:10.1002/ese3.609 · Cited by 149
Ning, Z., Zhang, H., Li, W., Zhang, R., Liu, G., & Chen, C. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.001 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, M. A., Pires, O. C., Mota, M., & Alves, M. M.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-31
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-23
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2151278717
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaerobic biodegradation of oleic and palmitic acids: Evidence of mass transfer limitations caused by long chain fatty acid accumulation onto the anaerobic sludge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.20548
- The paper
- Pereira, M. A., Pires, O. C., Mota, M., & Alves, M. M. (2005). Anaerobic biodegradation of oleic and palmitic acids: Evidence of mass transfer limitations caused by long chain fatty acid accumulation onto the anaerobic sludge. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20548
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.