The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fermentative hydrogen production and bacterial community structure in high‐rate anaerobic bioreactors containing silicone‐immobilized and self‐flocculated sludge
Abstract
A novel continuously stirred anaerobic bioreactor (CSABR) seeded with silicone‐immobilized sludge was developed for high‐rate fermentative H 2 production using sucrose as the limiting substrate. The CSABR system was operated at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 0.5–6 h and an influent sucrose concentration of 10–40 g COD/L. With a high feeding sucrose concentration (i.e., 30–40 g COD/L) and a short HRT (0.5 h), the CSABR reactor produced H 2 more efficiently with the highest volumetric rate (${\nu}_{{\rm H}_2}$) of 15 L/h/L (i.e., 14.7 mol/d/L) and an optimal yield of ca. 3.5 mol H 2/mol sucrose. The maximum ${\nu}_{{\rm H}_2}$ value obtained from this work is much higher than any other ${\nu}_{{\rm H}_2}$ values ever documented. Formation of self‐flocculated granular sludge occurred during operation at a short HRT. The granule formation is thought to play a pivotal role in the dramatic enhancement of H 2 production rate, because it led to more efficient biomass retention. A high biomass concentration of up to 35.4 g VSS/L was achieved even though the reactor was operated at an extremely low HRT (i.e., 0.5 h). In addition to gaining high biomass concentrations, formation of granular sludge also triggered a transition in bacterial community structure, resulting in a nearly twofold increase in the specific H 2 production rate. According to denatured‐gradient‐gel‐electrophoresis analysis, operations at a progressively decreasing HRT resulted in a decrease in bacterial population diversity. The culture with the best H 2 production performance (at HRT = 0.5 h and sucrose concentration = 30 g COD/L) was eventually dominated by a presumably excellent H 2‐producing bacterial species identified as Clostridium pasteurianum. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Standard methods: For the examination of water and waste water
(1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90598-4 · Cited by 72,091
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
Jenkins, S. H. (1982) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(82)90249-4 · Cited by 30,002
Muyzer, G., de Waal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 · Cited by 11,429
Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation
Amann, R., Ludwig, W., & SCHLEIFER, K. H. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.59.1.143-169.1995 · Cited by 9,093
Sustainable Hydrogen Production
Turner, J. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103197 · Cited by 6,602
Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature
Das, D. (2001) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(00)00058-6 · Cited by 2,093
Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application
Levin, D. (2004) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(03)00094-6 · Cited by 1,620
Nübel, U., Engelen, B., Felske, A., Snaidr, J., Wieshuber, A., Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W., & Backhaus, H. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.19.5636-5643.1996 · Cited by 1,355
Sustainable fermentative hydrogen production: challenges for process optimisation
HAWKES, F. (2002) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(02)00090-3 · Cited by 931
Cited by
Fermentative hydrogen production from wastewaters: A review and prognosis
Lin, C.-Y., Lay, C.-H., Sen, B., Chu, C.-Y., Kumar, G., Chen, C.-C., & Chang, J.-S. (2012) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.072 · Cited by 310
Self-citationBioreactor and process design for biohydrogen production
Show, K.-Y., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.055 · Cited by 290
Self-citationLin, P.-Y., Whang, L.-M., Wu, Y.-R., Ren, W.-J., Hsiao, C.-J., Li, S.-L., & Chang, J.-S. (2007) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.12.009 · Cited by 280
Self-citationSivagurunathan, P., Kumar, G., Bakonyi, P., Kim, S.-H., Kobayashi, T., Xu, K. Q., Lakner, G., Tóth, G., Nemestóthy, N., & Bélafi-Bakó, K. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.081 · Cited by 266
A Review of the Role of Critical Parameters in the Design and Operation of Biogas Production Plants
Sarker, S., Lamb, J. J., Hjelme, D. R., & Lien, K. M. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9091915 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, S., Hung, C., Lin, C., Chen, H., Lee, A., & Chang, J.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 934-946
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W1963680642
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 78.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fermentative hydrogen production and bacterial community structure in high‐rate anaerobic bioreactors containing silicone‐immobilized and self‐flocculated sludge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.20800
- The paper
- Wu, S., Hung, C., Lin, C., Chen, H., Lee, A., & Chang, J. (2006). Fermentative hydrogen production and bacterial community structure in high‐rate anaerobic bioreactors containing silicone‐immobilized and self‐flocculated sludge. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.