The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of isolated lignins, obtained from a range of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates, on enzymatic hydrolysis
Abstract
The influence of the residual lignin remaining in the cellulosic rich component of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates on subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis was assessed. Twelve lignin preparations were isolated by two isolation methods (protease treated lignin (PTL) and cellulolytic enzymatic lignin (CEL)) from three types of biomass (corn stover, poplar, and lodgepole pine) that had been pretreated by two processes (steam and organosolv pretreatments). Comparative analysis of the isolated lignin showed that the CEL contained lower amounts of carbohydrates and protein than did the PTL and that the isolated lignin from corn stover contained more carbohydrates than did the lignin derived from the poplar and lodgepole pine. The lower yields of acid insoluble lignin (AIL) obtained from the corn stover when using the PTL method indicated that the lignin from the corn stover had a higher hydrophilicity than did the lignin from the poplar and lodgepole pine. The isolated lignin preparations were added to the reaction mixture containing crystalline cellulose (Avicel) and their possible effects on enzymatic hydrolysis were assessed. It was apparent that the lignin isolated from lodgepole pine and steam pretreated poplar decreased the hydrolysis yields of Avicel, whereas the other isolated lignins did not appear to decrease the hydrolysis yields significantly. The hydrolysis yields of the pretreated lignocellulose and those of Avicel containing the PTL showed good correlation, indicating that the nature of the residual lignin obtained after pretreatment significantly influenced hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;105: 871–879. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Substrate and Enzyme Characteristics that Limit Cellulose Hydrolysis
Mansfield, S. D., Mooney, C., & Saddler, J. N. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp9900864 · Cited by 869
Self-citation
Cited by
Ko, J. K., Kim, Y., Ximenes, E., & Ladisch, M. R. (2015) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.25349 · Cited by 357
Yuan, Y., Jiang, B., Chen, H., Wu, W., Wu, S., Jin, Y., & Xiao, H. (2021) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-021-02054-1 · Cited by 344
da Silva, A. S., Espinheira, R. P., Teixeira, R. S. S., de Souza, M. F., Ferreira-Leitão, V., & Bon, E. P. S. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-020-01697-w · Cited by 322
Sathitsuksanoh, N., Zhu, Z., & Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2012) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9719-z · Cited by 63
Wang, C., Ouyang, X., Su, S., Liang, X., Zhang, C., Wang, W., Yuan, Q., & Li, Q. (2016) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.07.008 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakagame, S., Chandra, R. P., & Saddler, J. N.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 871-879
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2075167329
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.