Dissolved Oxygen and pH Profile Evolution after Cryovial Thaw and Repeated Cell Passaging in a T-75 Flask
Abstract
Routine cell culture is done in small-scale disposable vessels (typically 0.1-100 mL volumes) in academia and industry. Despite their wide use in bioprocess development (i.e., process optimization and process validation), miniature process scouting devices (PSDs) are considered "black boxes" because they are generally not equipped with sensors. In this study, we show that on-line monitoring of dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH in a T-75 flask-based PSD can be achieved during cell passaging and that this information can be linked to different cellular metabolic states. In this case, on-line monitoring of DO and pH show three distinctive metabolic regions in passages 1-18, 19-28, 29-54 and in particular, the shift in the pH curve, the specific oxygen uptake rate (q(O2)), and the lactate production rate to the oxygen consumption rate yield (Y(Lac/ox)) confirm the existence of these distinctive metabolic regions. These findings are particularly useful because they show that sensor equipped PSDs can help to monitor cell culture behavior after thaw, in pre- and seed culture prior to scale-up and in development/optimization studies. Such routine monitoring will help to develop more consistent cell culture techniques.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reported median decline in pH was 0.43 units, but in some particularly extreme cases, cell metabolic activity promoted pH reductions that approached one pH unit and dissolved O2 decreased down to 0.95%.
“The reported median decline in pH was 0.43 units, but in some particularly extreme cases, cell metabolic activity promoted pH reductions that approached one pH unit (Eagle, 1971) and dissolved O2 decreased down to 0.95% (Vallejos et al., 2010).”
From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Vallejos et al., 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Vallejos, J. R., Brorson, K. A., Moreira, A. R., & Rao, G.
- Affiliations
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rao, Govind
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-19
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1040-1047
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2092564795
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Keywords
- dissolved oxygen, pH profile, subculture, online monitoring, cellular metabolism, specific oxygen uptake rate, lactic acid production, seed culture, bioprocess development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biotechnology, Freezing, Glucose, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Multiple Myeloma, Oxygen, Cell Culture Techniques, Lactic Acid, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review