Cited by 300

The effect of shear stress on biofilm loss rate

Rittman, Bruce E.·1982·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.260240219

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The average specific growth rate in a biofilm process can be manipulated by changes to shear stress or turbulence induced by the normal liquid flow regime or by intentional biofilm-management strategies to periodically remove some of the biofilm.

    “which can be manipulated by changes to shear stress or turbulence induced by the normal liquid flow regime (Rittmann 1982, Laspidou and Rittmann 2004a,b, Wanner et al. 2006) or by intentional biofilm-management strategies to periodically remove some of the biofilm.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. B. E. Rittmann and P. L. McCarty, Biotechnof. Bioeng.. 22, 2343 (1980).
  2. E. J. Arcuri and T. L. Donaldson, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 23, 2149 (1981).
  3. M. G. Trulear and W. G. Characklis, "Dynamics of Biofilm Processes," paper presented at the 53rd Annual Conference of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 28-Oct. 3, 1980.
  4. R. H. Perry and C. H. Chilton, Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973).
  5. J. L. Cleasby, "Filtration," in Physiocochemical Processes for Water Qualify Control. W. J. Weber, Jr., Ed. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rittman, B. E.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
501-506
ISSN
  • 0006-3592
  • 1097-0290
Cited by
300
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review