The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective filtration
Abstract
Although protein fractionation by selective membrane filtration has numerous potential applications in both the downstream processing of fermentation broths and the purification of plasma proteins, the selectivity for proteins with only moderately different molecular weights has generally been quite poor. We have obtained experimental data for the transport of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and immunoglobulins (IgG) through 100,000 and 300,000 molecular weight cutoff polyethersulfone membranes in a stirred ultrafiltration device at different solution pH and ionic strength. The selectivity was a complex function of the flux due to the simultaneous convective and diffusive solute transport through the membrane and the bulk mass transfer limitations in the stirred cell. Under phsioligical conditions (pH 7.0 and 0.15 M NaCI) the maximum selectivity for the BSA‐IgG separation was only about 2.0 due primarily to the effects of protein adsorption. In contrast, BSA‐IgG selectivities as high as 50 were obtained with the same membranes when the protein solution was at pH 4.8 and 0.0015 M NaCl. This enhanced selectivity was a direct result of the electrosatatic contributions to both bulk and membrane transport. The membrane selectivity could actually be reversed, with higher passage of the larger IgG molecules, by using a 300,000 molecular weight cutoff membrane at pH 7.4 and an ionic strength of 0.0015 M NaCl. These results clearly demonstrate that the effectiveness of selective protein filtration can be dramatically altered by appropriately controlling electrostatic interactions through changes in pH and/or ionic strength. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioprocess membrane technology
van Reis, R., & Zydney, A. (2007) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.045 · Cited by 773
Self-citationHigh-performance tangential flow filtration using charged membranes
van Reis, R., Brake, J. M., Charkoudian, J., Burns, D. B., & Zydney, A. L. (1999) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00048-4 · Cited by 182
Self-citationLysozyme separation by hollow-fibre ultrafiltration
Ghosh, R., Silva, S. S., & Cui, Z. (2000) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/s1369-703x(00)00069-3 · Cited by 85
Separation of lysozyme from chicken egg white using ultrafiltration
Wan, Y., Lu, J., & Cui, Z. (2006) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2005.07.003 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Saksena, S., & Zydney, A. L.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-04-25
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 960-968
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2087154653
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective filtration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.260431009
- The paper
- Saksena, S., & Zydney, A. L. (1994). Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective filtration. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260431009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.