Combinatorial genome and protein engineering yields monoclonal antibodies with hypergalactosylation from CHO cells
Abstract
One of the key quality attributes of monoclonal antibodies is the glycan pattern and distribution. Two terminal galactose residues typically represent a small fraction of the total glycans from antibodies. However, antibodies with defined glycosylation properties including enhanced galactosylation have been shown to exhibit altered properties for these important biomedical modalities. In this study, the disruption of two α-2,3 sialyltransferases (ST3GAL4 and ST3GAL6) from Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells was combined with protein engineering of the Fc region to generate an IgG containing 80% bigalactosylated and fucosylated (G2F) glycoforms. Expression of the same single amino acid mutant (F241A) IgG in CHO cells with a triple gene knockout of fucosyltransferase (FUT8) plus ST3GAL4 and ST3GAL6 lowered the galactosylation glycoprofile to 65% bigalactosylated G2 glycans. However, overexpression of IgGs with four amino acid substitutions recovered the G2 glycoform composition approximately 80%. Combining genome and protein engineering in CHO cells will provide a new antibody production platform that enables biotechnologists to generate glycoforms standards for specific biomedical and biotechnology applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disruption of ST3GALT4/6 and FUT8 combined with the same mutations produced hypergalactosylated IgG for the first time in vivo.
“disruption of ST3GALT4/6 and FUT8 was combined with the same mutations to produce hypergalactosylated IgG for the first time in vivo [116].”
From Glycoengineering Chinese hamster ovary cells: a short history (2021) · cites this paper as [116]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Chung, C., Wang, Q., Yang, S., Ponce, S. A., Kirsch, B. J., Zhang, H., & Betenbaugh, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Betenbaugh, Michael J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09-19
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2848-2856
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2724308281
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1264802, 1512265)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Keywords
- monoclonal antibodies, antibody glycosylation, galactosylation, ST3GAL4, FUT8, fucosylation, glycoforms, CHO cells, glycoproteomics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Chromosome Mapping, Cricetulus, Galactose, Glycosylation, Immunoglobulin G, Protein Engineering, CHO Cells, Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques, Genetic Enhancement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review