Cited by 0Probiotics and Fermented FoodsDermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and Aging

A Microbial Formulation Perspective on Probiotic Skincare: Viability, Challenges, and Current Approaches to Maintain Probiotic Viability

Open access
Rezaei, Farzaneh, Rollin, Joseph A.·2026·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

The human body hosts a vast and dynamic microbial ecosystem that plays essential roles in immunity, metabolism, and tissue function. Growing scientific and consumer interest in the human microbiome has accelerated innovation in topical skincare, particularly in the emerging category of probiotic, prebiotic, and postbiotic formulations. However, despite rapid market growth, most commercial products rely on non‐viable microbial derivatives rather than live, strain‐identified organisms, largely due to formulation, regulatory, and stability challenges. This review provides a microbial formulation perspective on probiotic skincare, beginning with an overview of the human and skin microbiomes, followed by a discussion of how beneficial microorganisms influence skin appearance and barrier function. We clarify the definitions and scientific distinctions among probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics and evaluate current cosmetic applications. We then explore the technical and regulatory hurdles associated with incorporating live microbes into cosmetic products, including preservative compatibility, viability, packaging, and activation requirements. Finally, we present some available strategies and technologies in an effort to keep probiotic viable until use and outline future research considerations needed to advance authentic, evidence‐based probiotic skincare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.70268

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40

Authors
Rezaei, F., & Rollin, J. A.
Affiliations
Fafabiotic LLC Cary North Carolina USA
Corresponding author
Rezaei, Farzaneh
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-06-11
Volume
123
Issue
9
Pages
2415-2425
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W7164331466
Cited by
0
References
40
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, skin microbiome, human microbiome, probiotic viability, cosmetic formulation, skin barrier function, topical cosmetics, regulatory challenges
MeSH terms
Skin Microbiome, Cosmetics, Humans, Skin, Skin Care, Probiotics, Microbial Viability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review