The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery
Open accessAbstract
Background: Quality assurance is acknowledged as a crucial factor in the assessment of oncological surgical care. The aim of this study was to develop a composite measure of multiple outcome parameters defined as ‘textbook outcome’, to assess quality of care for patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Methods: Patients with oesophagogastric cancer, operated on with the intent of curative resection between 2011 and 2014, were identified from a national database (Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit). Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. Hospital variation in textbook outcome was analysed after adjustment for case-mix factors. Results: In total, 2748 patients with oesophageal cancer and 1772 with gastric cancer were included in this study. A textbook outcome was achieved in 29·7 per cent of patients with oesophageal cancer and 32·1 per cent of those with gastric cancer. Adjusted textbook outcome rates varied from 8·5 to 52·4 per cent between hospitals. The outcome parameter ‘at least 15 lymph nodes examined’ had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome both for patients with oesophageal cancer and for those with gastric cancer. Conclusion: Most patients did not achieve a textbook outcome and there was wide variation between hospitals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience
Clavien, P. A., Barkun, J., de Oliveira, M. L., Vauthey, J. N., Dindo, D., Schulick, R. D., de Santibañes, E., Pekolj, J., Slankamenac, K., Bassi, C., et al. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b13ca2 · Cited by 11,482
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,736
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2002) · Journal For Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2002.tb00463.x · Cited by 8,483
Evaluating the quality of medical care
DONABEDIAN, A. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x · Cited by 6,102
Egner, J. R. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1525 · Cited by 5,997
Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States
Birkmeyer, J. D., Siewers, A. E., Finlayson, E. V. A., Stukel, T. A., Lucas, F. L., Batista, I., Welch, H. G., & Wennberg, D. E. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa012337 · Cited by 4,999
Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Donabedian, A. (1966) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348969 · Cited by 4,312
Shapiro, J., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Hulshof, M. C. C. M., van Hagen, P., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Hospers, G. A. P., Bonenkamp, J. J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00040-6 · Cited by 2,565
Self-citation
Cited by
Textbook Outcome: Definition and Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Lung Transplantation
Halpern, S. E., Moris, D., Gloria, J. N., Shaw, B. I., Haney, J. C., Klapper, J. A., Barbas, A. S., & Hartwig, M. G. (2023) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004916 · Cited by 40
Definition and Analysis of Textbook Outcome: A Novel Quality Measure in Kidney Transplantation
Halpern, S. E., Moris, D., Shaw, B. I., Kesseli, S. J., Samoylova, M. L., Manook, M., Schmitz, R., Collins, B. H., Sanoff, S. L., Ravindra, K. V., et al. (2021) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-020-05943-y · Cited by 24
Textbook surgical outcome in lung transplantation: analysis of a US national registry
Krischak, M. K., Au, S., Halpern, S. E., Olaso, D. G., Moris, D., Snyder, L. D., Barbas, A. S., Haney, J. C., Klapper, J. A., & Hartwig, M. G. (2022) · Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ctr.14588 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Busweiler, L. A. D., Schouwenburg, M. G., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Kolfschoten, N. E., de Jong, P. C., Rozema, T., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., van Hillegersberg, R., Wouters, M. W. J. M., van Sandick, J. W., Bosscha, K., Cats, A., Dikken, J. L., van Grieken, N. C. T., Hartgrink, H. H., Lemmens, V. E. P. P., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Plukker, J. T., Rosman, C., Siersema, P. D., Tetteroo, G., Veldhuis, P. M. J. F., & Voncken, F. E. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-02-27
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 742-750
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2593186461
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.10486
- The paper
- Busweiler, L. A. D., Schouwenburg, M. G., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Kolfschoten, N. E., de Jong, P. C., Rozema, T., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., van Hillegersberg, R., Wouters, M. W. J. M., van Sandick, J. W., Bosscha, K., Cats, A., Dikken, J. L., van Grieken, N. C. T., Hartgrink, H. H., Lemmens, V. E. P. P., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Plukker, J. T., Rosman, C., . . . Voncken, F. E. M. (2017). Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
