The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis of microsatellite instability in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric cancer
Abstract
Background: Several associations between microsatellite instability (MSI) and other clinicopathological factors have been reported in gastric cancer, but the results have been ambiguous. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the relationship between MSI and overall survival and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with gastric cancer. Methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane and Ovid databases until 31 January 2016 was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The articles were screened independently according to PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) eligibility criteria. All eligible articles were evaluated independently by two reviewers for risk of bias according to the Quality In Prognosis Study tool. Results: Overall, 48 studies with a total of 18 612 patients were included. MSI was found in 9·2 per cent of patients (1718 of 18 612), and was associated with female sex (odds ratio (OR) 1·57, 95 per cent c.i. 1·31 to 1·89; P < 0·001), older age (OR 1·58, 2·20 to 1·13; P < 0·001), intestinal Laurén histological type (OR 2·23, 1·94 to 2·57; P < 0·001), mid/lower gastric location (OR 0·38, 0·32 to 0·44; P < 0·001), lack of lymph node metastases (OR 0·70, 0·57 to 0·86, P < 0·001) and TNM stage I–II (OR 1·77, 1·47 to 2·13; P < 0·001). The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival of patients with MSI versus those with non-MSI gastric cancer from 21 studies was 0·69 (95 per cent c.i. 0·56 to 0·86; P < 0·001). Conclusion: MSI in gastric cancer was associated with good overall survival, reflected in several favourable clinicopathological tumour characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global cancer statistics, 2012
Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet‐Tieulent, J., & Jemal, A. (2015) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21262 · Cited by 26,850
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13480 · Cited by 6,498
Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis.
Tierney, J. F., Stewart, L. A., Ghersi, D., Burdett, S., & Sydes, M. R. (2007) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-8-16 · Cited by 6,208
Egner, J. R. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1525 · Cited by 5,997
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Tarsilla, M. (2010) · Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation · doi:10.56645/jmde.v6i14.284 · Cited by 5,178
The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions
(1995) · ACP Journal Club · doi:10.7326/acpjc-1995-123-3-a12 · Cited by 2,931
Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes
Cristescu, R., Lee, J., Nebozhyn, M., Kim, K.-M., Ting, J. C., Wong, S. S., Liu, J., Yue, Y. G., Wang, J., Yu, K., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3850 · Cited by 2,223
Self-citation
Cited by
Luchini, C., Bibeau, F., Ligtenberg, M. J. L., Singh, N., Nottegar, A., Bosse, T., Miller, R., Riaz, N., Douillard, J.-Y., Andre, F., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz116 · Cited by 1,041
Li, Y., Xu, C., Wang, B., Xu, F., Ma, F., Qu, Y., Jiang, D., Li, K., Feng, J., Tian, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33282-0 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Polom, K., Marano, L., Marrelli, D., De Luca, R., Roviello, G., Savelli, V, Tan, P., & Roviello, F.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-02-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-167
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2767058431
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analysis of microsatellite instability in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.10663
- The paper
- Polom, K., Marano, L., Marrelli, D., De Luca, R., Roviello, G., Savelli, V, Tan, P., & Roviello, F. (2018). Meta-analysis of microsatellite instability in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric cancer. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.