Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society

Henriksen, N A, Montgomery, A, Kaufmann, R, Berrevoet, F, East, B, Fischer, J, Hope, W, Klassen, D, Lorenz, R, Renard, Y, Garcia Urena, M A, Simons, M P·2020·British Journal of Surgery
DOI 10.1002/bjs.11489
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs are frequently performed surgical procedures with an expected low complication rate. Nevertheless, the optimal method of repair with best short- and long-term outcomes remains debatable. The aim was to develop guidelines for the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Methods: The guideline group consisted of surgeons from Europe and North America including members from the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) critical appraisal checklists, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument were used. A systematic literature search was done on 1 May 2018, and updated on 1 February 2019. Results: Literature reporting specifically on umbilical and epigastric hernias was limited in quantity and quality, resulting in a majority of the recommendations being graded as weak, based on low-quality evidence. The main recommendation was to use mesh for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias to reduce the recurrence rate. Most umbilical and epigastric hernias may be repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh. A laparoscopic approach may be considered if the hernia defect is large, or if the patient has an increased risk of wound morbidity. Conclusion: This is the first European and American guideline on the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias. It is recommended that symptomatic umbilical and epigastric hernias are repaired by an open approach with a preperitoneal flat mesh.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.11489

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 125

  1. Helgstrand, 2013, Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair, Hernia, 17, 487, 10.1007/s10029-013-1120-9 · DOI
  2. Antoniou, 2018, European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias, Hernia, 22, 183, 10.1007/s10029-017-1697-5 · DOI
  3. HerniaSurge Group, 2018, International guidelines for groin hernia management, Hernia, 22, 1, 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x · DOI
  4. Bittner, 2014, Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS]) – part III, Surg Endosc, 28, 380, 10.1007/s00464-013-3172-4 · DOI
  5. Bittner, 2014, International Endohernia Society (IEHS). Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS) – part 1, Surg Endosc, 28, 2, 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6 · DOI
  6. Bittner, 2014, Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS]) – part 2, Surg Endosc, 28, 353, 10.1007/s00464-013-3171-5 · DOI
  7. Earle, 2016, SAGES Guidelines Committee. SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, Surg Endosc, 30, 3163, 10.1007/s00464-016-5072-x · DOI
  8. Liang, 2017, Ventral hernia management: expert consensus guided by systematic review, Ann Surg, 265, 80, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701 · DOI
  9. Birindelli, 2017, 2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias, World J Emerg Surg, 12, 37, 10.1186/s13017-017-0149-y · DOI
  10. Henriksen, 2020, European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society. EHS and AHS guidelines for treatment of primary ventral hernias in rare locations or special circumstances, Br J Surg Open, 10.1002/bjs.11489
  11. Bedewi, 2012, Prevalence of adult paraumbilical hernia. Assessment by high-resolution sonography: a hospital-based study, Hernia, 16, 59, 10.1007/s10029-011-0863-4 · DOI
  12. Burcharth, 2015, The prevalence of umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: a nationwide epidemiologic study, Hernia, 19, 815, 10.1007/s10029-015-1376-3 · DOI
  13. Henriksen, 2016, Systemic and local collagen turnover in hernia patients, Dan Med J, 63, B5265
  14. Oma, 2017, Colonic diverticulosis is associated with abdominal wall hernia, Hernia, 21, 525, 10.1007/s10029-017-1598-7 · DOI
  15. Kelly, 2013, Pediatric abdominal wall defects, Surg Clin North Am, 93, 1255, 10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.016 · DOI
  16. Muysoms, 2009, Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias, Hernia, 13, 407, 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x · DOI
  17. Muysoms, 2012, EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair, Hernia, 16, 239, 10.1007/s10029-012-0912-7 · DOI
  18. Young, 2007, The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias, Hernia, 11, 347, 10.1007/s10029-007-0227-2 · DOI
  19. Deitch, 1981, Ultrasonic diagnosis of surgical disease of the inguinal–femoral region, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 152, 319
  20. Cherla, 2018, Differences of alternative methods of measuring abdominal wall hernia defect size: a prospective observational study, Surg Endosc, 32, 1228, 10.1007/s00464-017-5797-1 · DOI
  21. Kokotovic, 2016, Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe, Hernia, 20, 281, 10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z · DOI
  22. Holihan, 2017, A prospective assessment of clinical and patient-reported outcomes of initial non-operative management of ventral hernias, World J Surg, 41, 1267, 10.1007/s00268-016-3859-5 · DOI
  23. Christoffersen, 2015, Clinical outcomes after elective repair for small umbilical and epigastric hernias, Dan Med J, 62, B5161
  24. DeLancey, 2018, The effect of smoking on 30-day outcomes in elective hernia repair, Am J Surg, 216, 471, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.03.004 · DOI
  25. Halm, 2005, Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair, Hernia, 9, 334, 10.1007/s10029-005-0010-1 · DOI
  26. Venclauskas, 2017, Long-term follow-up results of umbilical hernia repair, Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 12, 350
  27. Yao, 2016, Predictors of recurrence of umbilical hernias following primary tissue repair in obese veterans, Am J Surg, 211, 18, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.014 · DOI
  28. Asolati, 2006, Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience, Am J Surg, 192, 627, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.022 · DOI
  29. Köhler, 2015, Sutured repair of primary small umbilical and epigastric hernias: concomitant rectus diastasis is a significant risk factor for recurrence, World J Surg, 39, 121, 10.1007/s00268-014-2765-y · DOI
  30. Shankaran, 2011, A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair, Ann Surg, 253, 16, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f9b6e6 · DOI
  31. Venclauskas, 2008, Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence, Medicina (Kaunas), 44, 855, 10.3390/medicina44110108 · DOI
  32. Shankar, 2017, Factors associated with long-term outcomes of umbilical hernia repair, JAMA Surg, 152, 461, 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5052 · DOI
  33. Martindale, 2013, Preoperative risk reduction: strategies to optimize outcomes, Surg Clin North Am, 93, 1041, 10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.015 · DOI
  34. Allegranzi, 2016, WHO Guidelines Development Group. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective, Lancet Infect Dis, 16, e288, 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9 · DOI
  35. Aufenacker, 2006, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia, Br J Surg, 93, 5, 10.1002/bjs.5186 · DOI
  36. Abramov, 1996, Antibiotic prophylaxis in umbilical and incisional hernia repair: a prospective randomised study, Eur J Surg, 162, 945
  37. Arroyo, 2001, Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults, Br J Surg, 88, 1321, 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01893.x · DOI
  38. Polat, 2005, Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system, Am J Surg, 190, 61, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.021 · DOI
  39. Schumacher, 2003, Long-term results after Spitzy's umbilical hernia repair, Chirurg, 74, 50, 10.1007/s00104-002-0536-z · DOI
  40. Christoffersen, 2015, Long-term recurrence and chronic pain after repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias: a regional cohort study, Am J Surg, 209, 725, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.021 · DOI
  41. Aslani, 2010, Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis, Hernia, 14, 455, 10.1007/s10029-010-0705-9 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Nguyen, 2014, Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review, World J Surg, 38, 3097, 10.1007/s00268-014-2722-9 · DOI
  43. Mathes, 2016, Suture versus mesh repair in primary and incisional ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis, World J Surg, 40, 826, 10.1007/s00268-015-3311-2 · DOI
  44. Bisgaard, 2018, Lower risk of recurrence after mesh repair versus non-mesh sutured repair in open umbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Scand J Surg, 108, 187, 10.1177/1457496918812208 · DOI
  45. Shrestha, 2019, Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Int J Surg, 62, 62, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.12.015 · DOI
  46. Lal, 2012, A comparative study of anatomical repair versus mesh repair in paraumbilical hernia, Med Channel, 19, 110
  47. Tunio, 2017, Hernioplasty: tension free mesh repair versus Mayos repair for umbilical hernias, J Pak Med Assoc, 67, 24
  48. Kaufmann, 2018, Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial, Lancet, 391, 860, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Berger, 2014, Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs, J Surg Res, 192, 426, 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.080 · DOI
  50. Dalenbäck, 2013, Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs, Hernia, 17, 493, 10.1007/s10029-012-0988-0 · DOI
  51. Porrero, 2019, Umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis: a single-centre experience, Hernia, 23, 143, 10.1007/s10029-018-1843-8 · DOI
  52. Christoffersen, 2013, Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study, World J Surg, 37, 2548, 10.1007/s00268-013-2160-0 · DOI
  53. Winsnes, 2016, Surgical outcome of mesh and suture repair in primary umbilical hernia: postoperative complications and recurrence, Hernia, 20, 509, 10.1007/s10029-016-1466-x · DOI
  54. Mayo, 1901, VI. An operation for the radical cure of umbilical hernia, Ann Surg, 34, 276, 10.1097/00000658-190107000-00021 · DOI
  55. Abdel-Baki, 2007, Comparison of prosthetic mesh repair and tissue repair in the emergency management of incarcerated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study, Hernia, 11, 163, 10.1007/s10029-007-0189-4 · DOI
  56. Li, 2014, Outcomes of acute versus elective primary ventral hernia repair, J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 76, 523, 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0743 · DOI
  57. Beadles, 2015, Trends in emergent hernia repair in the United States, JAMA Surg, 150, 194, 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1242 · DOI
  58. Bessa, 2013, Results of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated ventral hernias: a seven years study, Hernia, 17, 59, 10.1007/s10029-012-0938-x · DOI
  59. Nieuwenhuizen, 2011, The use of mesh in acute hernia: frequency and outcome in 99 cases, Hernia, 15, 297, 10.1007/s10029-010-0779-4 · DOI
  60. Christoffersen, 2014, Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after hernia mesh repair, World J Surg, 38, 1852, 10.1007/s00268-013-2411-0 · DOI
  61. Bensaadi, 2014, Intraperitoneal tension-free repair of a small midline ventral abdominal wall hernia: randomized study with a mean follow-up of 3 years, Am Surg, 80, 57, 10.1177/000313481408000125 · DOI
  62. Muysoms, 2018, International Hernia Collaboration consensus on nomenclature of abdominal wall hernia repair, World J Surg, 42, 302, 10.1007/s00268-017-4115-3 · DOI
  63. Muysoms, 2018, IPOM: history of an acronym, Hernia, 22, 743, 10.1007/s10029-018-1804-2 · DOI
  64. Ponten, 2018, Mesh versus patch repair for epigastric and umbilical hernia (MORPHEUS Trial); one-year results of a randomized controlled trial, World J Surg, 42, 1312, 10.1007/s00268-017-4297-8 · DOI
  65. Ponten, 2019, Mesh OR patch for hernia on epigastric and umbilical sites (MORPHEUS-Trial): the complete two-year follow-up, Ann Surg, 270, 33, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003086 · DOI
  66. Berrevoet, 2017, A multicenter prospective study of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal positioning using the monofilament polyester composite ventral patch: interim results of the PANACEA study, Med Devices (Auckl), 10, 81
  67. Perrakis, 2003, A new tension-free technique for the repair of umbilical hernia, using the Prolene Hernia System – early results from 48 cases, Hernia, 7, 178, 10.1007/s10029-003-0132-2 · DOI
  68. Vychnevskaia, 2010, Intraperitoneal mesh repair of small ventral abdominal wall hernias with a Ventralex hernia patch, Dig Surg, 27, 433, 10.1159/000318783 · DOI
  69. Tollens, 2011, Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex™ hernia patch, Hernia, 15, 531, 10.1007/s10029-011-0816-y · DOI
  70. Martin, 2008, Ventralex mesh in umbilical/epigastric hernia repairs: clinical outcomes and complications, Hernia, 12, 379, 10.1007/s10029-008-0351-7 · DOI
  71. Keating, 2016, Outcomes of 157 V-Patch™ implants in the repair of umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias, Am Surg, 82, 6, 10.1177/000313481608200105 · DOI
  72. Muysoms, 2011, Complications of mesh devices for intraperitoneal umbilical hernia repair: a word of caution, Hernia, 15, 463, 10.1007/s10029-010-0692-x · DOI
  73. Greco, 2014, Feasibility and effectiveness of primary umbilical hernia repair with biologic graft: preliminary study, Acta Chir Belg, 114, 125, 10.1080/00015458.2014.11680994 · DOI
  74. Haskins, 2017, Onlay with adhesive use compared with sublay mesh placement in ventral hernia repair: was Chevrel right? An Americas Hernia Society quality collaborative analysis, J Am Coll Surg, 224, 962, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.048 · DOI
  75. Holihan, 2016, Sublay versus underlay in open ventral hernia repair, J Surg Res, 202, 26, 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.014 · DOI
  76. Holihan, 2017, Ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Surg Infect (Larchmt), 18, 647, 10.1089/sur.2017.029 · DOI
  77. LeBlanc, 2016, Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair, Hernia, 20, 85, 10.1007/s10029-015-1399-9 · DOI
  78. Porrero, 2018, Importance of mesh overlap on hernia recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair with bilayer prosthesis, Am J Surg, 216, 919, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.041 · DOI
  79. Jairam, 2017, The feasibility of local anesthesia for the surgical treatment of umbilical hernia: a systematic review of the literature, Hernia, 21, 223, 10.1007/s10029-017-1577-z · DOI
  80. García-Ureña, 2000, Anesthesia and surgical repair of aponeurotic hernias in ambulatory surgery, Ambul Surg, 8, 175, 10.1016/S0966-6532(00)00053-6 · DOI
  81. Hajibandeh, 2017, Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Hernia, 21, 905, 10.1007/s10029-017-1683-y · DOI
  82. Castro, 2014, Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the repair of ventral hernias: systematic review and meta-analysis, Arq Gastroenterol, 51, 205, 10.1590/S0004-2803201400030008 · DOI
  83. Forbes, 2009, Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh, Br J Surg, 96, 851, 10.1002/bjs.6668 · DOI
  84. Liang, 2013, Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias, JAMA Surg, 148, 1043, 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3587 · DOI
  85. Sajid, 2009, Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis, Am J Surg, 197, 64, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.051 · DOI
  86. Sauerland, 2011, Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  87. Zhang, 2014, Laparoscopic versus open incisional and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis, World J Surg, 38, 2233, 10.1007/s00268-014-2578-z · DOI
  88. LeBlanc, 1993, Avoiding complications with laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, Surg Laparosc Endosc, 3, 420
  89. Patel, 2017, Risks of subsequent abdominal operations after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, Surg Endosc, 31, 823, 10.1007/s00464-016-5038-z · DOI
  90. Henriksen, 2019, Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, Hernia, 23, 17, 10.1007/s10029-018-1872-3 · DOI
  91. Schwarz, 2017, Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique (EMILOS) – a new technique for ventral hernia repair, Langenbecks Arch Surg, 402, 173, 10.1007/s00423-016-1522-0 · DOI
  92. Belyansky, 2018, A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair, Surg Endosc, 32, 1525, 10.1007/s00464-017-5840-2 · DOI
  93. Li, 2018, Totally endoscopic sublay (TES) repair for midline ventral hernia: surgical technique and preliminary results, Surg Endosc
  94. Baig, 2019, Extended totally extraperitoneal repair (eTEP) for ventral hernias: short-term results from a single centre, J Minim Access Surg, 15, 198, 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_29_18 · DOI
  95. Belyansky, 2018, Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair, Hernia, 22, 837, 10.1007/s10029-018-1795-z · DOI
  96. Sugiyama, 2015, Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair, JSLS, 19, 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00092 · DOI
  97. Kennedy, 2018, Robotic TAPP ventral hernia repair: early lessons learned at an inner city safety net hospital, JSLS, 22, 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00070 · DOI
  98. Carbonell, 2018, Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society quality collaborative, Ann Surg, 267, 210, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244 · DOI
  99. Warren, 2017, Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair, Surg Endosc, 31, 324, 10.1007/s00464-016-4975-x · DOI
  100. Martin-Del-Campo, 2018, Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release, Surg Endosc, 32, 840, 10.1007/s00464-017-5752-1 · DOI
  101. Lambrecht, 2015, Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: outcomes in primary versus incisional hernias: no effect of defect closure, Hernia, 19, 479, 10.1007/s10029-015-1345-x · DOI
  102. Suwa, 2016, Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature, Surg Today, 46, 764, 10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y · DOI
  103. Tandon, 2016, Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair, Br J Surg, 103, 1598, 10.1002/bjs.10268 · DOI
  104. Mitura, 2016, Different approach to laparoscopic IPOM ventral hernia surgery – what has the last decade taught us?, Pol Przegl Chir, 88, 54, 10.1515/pjs-2016-0028 · DOI
  105. Papageorge, 2017, Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair does not reduce 30-day wound complications, Surg Endosc, 31, 4551, 10.1007/s00464-017-5515-z · DOI
  106. Martin-Del-Campo, 2018, Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with and without defect closure: comparative analysis of a single-institution experience with 783 patients, Hernia, 22, 1061, 10.1007/s10029-018-1812-2 · DOI
  107. Hauters, 2017, Assessment of predictive factors for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique, Surg Endosc, 31, 3656, 10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0 · DOI
  108. Guérin, 2013, Impact of the defect size, the mesh overlap and the fixation depth on ventral hernia repairs: a combined experimental and numerical approach, Hernia, 17, 647, 10.1007/s10029-013-1050-6 · DOI
  109. Reynvoet, 2014, Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there an optimal mesh fixation technique? A systematic review, Langenbecks Arch Surg, 399, 55, 10.1007/s00423-013-1126-x · DOI
  110. Brill, 2011, Long-term outcomes with transfascial sutures versus tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a review, Am Surg, 77, 458, 10.1177/000313481107700423 · DOI
  111. Khan, 2018, Absorbable versus non-absorbable tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Surg, 53, 184, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.042 · DOI
  112. Sajid, 2013, A meta-analysis comparing tacker mesh fixation with suture mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair, Hernia, 17, 159, 10.1007/s10029-012-1017-z · DOI
  113. Baker, 2018, Systematic review and network meta-analysis of methods of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, Br J Surg, 105, 37, 10.1002/bjs.10720 · DOI
  114. Ahmed, 2018, Pain and surgical outcomes reporting after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in relation to mesh fixation technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 28, 1298, 10.1089/lap.2017.0609 · DOI
  115. Eriksen, 2011, Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant versus titanium tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair, Br J Surg, 98, 1537, 10.1002/bjs.7646 · DOI
  116. Eriksen, 2013, Fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized controlled double-blinded study, Hernia, 17, 511, 10.1007/s10029-013-1101-z · DOI
  117. Stirler, 2017, Postoperative pain after laparoscopic repair of primary umbilical hernia: titanium tacks versus absorbable tacks: a prospective comparative cohort analysis of 80 patients with a long-term follow-up, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 27, 424, 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000467 · DOI
  118. El-Sharkawy, 2013, Daycase hernia surgery: a missed training opportunity, Int J Surg, 11, 338, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.016 · DOI
  119. Bencini, 2004, Learning curve for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, Am J Surg, 187, 378, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.005 · DOI
  120. Light, 2013, Radiological and clinical examination in the diagnosis of Spigelian hernias, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 95, 98, 10.1308/003588413X13511609957092 · DOI
  121. Cox, 2016, The cost of preventable comorbidities on wound complications in open ventral hernia repair, J Surg Res, 206, 214, 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.009 · DOI
  122. Strosberg, 2017, Umbilical hernias: the cost of waiting, Surg Endosc, 31, 901, 10.1007/s00464-016-5052-1 · DOI
  123. Colavita, 2013, Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemographic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample, Surg Endosc, 27, 109, 10.1007/s00464-012-2432-z · DOI
  124. Ecker, 2016, Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data, Surg Endosc, 30, 906, 10.1007/s00464-015-4310-y · DOI
  125. Davila, 2016, The increased cost of ventral hernia recurrence: a cost analysis, Hernia, 20, 811, 10.1007/s10029-016-1515-5 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Henriksen, N. A., Montgomery, A., Kaufmann, R., Berrevoet, F., East, B., Fischer, J., Hope, W., Klassen, D., Lorenz, R., Renard, Y., Garcia Urena, M. A., & Simons, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital , Koege, Denmark
  • Department of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital , Malmö, Sweden
  • Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  • Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital , Ghent, Belgium
  • Third Department of Surgery at Motol University Hospital, First and Second Faculty of Medicine at Charles University , Prague, Czech Republic
  • University of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  • New Hanover Regional Medical Center , Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
  • Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Praxis 3+ Chirurgen , Berlin, Germany
  • Department of Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital , Reims, France
  • Henares University Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, Francisco de Vitoria University , Madrid, Spain
  • Department of Surgery, OLVG Hospital , Amsterdam, the Netherlands
ORCID
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2020-01-09
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
171-190
ISSN
  • 0007-1323
  • 1365-2168
DOI
10.1002/bjs.11489
Cited by
368
References
0
Language
en
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.