The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis
Abstract
One hundred and sixty-one consecutive patients with primary acute pancreatitis were admitted to a double-blind trial of intravenous Trasylol therapy as a supplement to a standard regimen of conservative management. The patients were subdivided into younger (less than 60 years) and older patients (aged 60 years and over), and subjects in each group were randomly allocated on a double-blind basis either to Trasylol therapy (starter 500 000 KIU and thereafter 200 000 q. i. d. for 5 days) or to placebo. There were 14 deaths (8.7 per cent), 7 in the Trasylol and 7 in the placebo group, and no significant difference was found in either the mortality or the major complications rate, either overall or within either age group. All 14 patients who died met the objective criteria for severe acute pancreatitis determined by the presence of at least three of a possible nine factors during the first 48 h of admission. Severe acute pancreatitis was present in 37 per cent of patients, who were evenly distributed between the Trasylol and placebo groups. Neither in those patients with severe nor those with less severe acute pancreatitis was there any significant difference between the two therapeutic regimens. Supplementary intravenous Trasylol therapy at this dosage confers no advantage over standard conservative treatment in the management of patients with primary acute pancreatitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical methods for quantifying the severity of clinical acute pancreatitis
Ranson, J. H. C., & Pasternack, B. S. (1977) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/0022-4804(77)90045-2 · Cited by 287
Cited by
Steinberg, W., & Tenner, S. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199404283301706 · Cited by 757
APACHE-II SCORE FOR ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS
Larvin, M., & Mcmahon, M. (1989) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90381-4 · Cited by 730
Clinical Application of Inhibitors of Fibrinolysis
Verstraete, M. (1985) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-198529030-00003 · Cited by 458
Dervenis, C., Johnson, C. D., Bassi, C., Bradley, E., Imrie, C. W., McMahon, M. J., & Modlin, I. (1999) · International journal of pancreatology · doi:10.1007/bf02925968 · Cited by 451
Self-citationMounzer, R., Langmead, C. J., Wu, B. U., Evans, A. C., Bishehsari, F., Muddana, V., Singh, V. K., Slivka, A., Whitcomb, D. C., Yadav, D., et al. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.03.005 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Imrie, C. W., Benjamin, I. S., Ferguson, J. C., McKay, A. J., Mackenzie, I., O'Neill, J., & Blumgart, L. H.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1978-05-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 337-341
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1982227777
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800650514
- The paper
- Imrie, C. W., Benjamin, I. S., Ferguson, J. C., McKay, A. J., Mackenzie, I., O'Neill, J., & Blumgart, L. H. (1978). A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800650514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.