The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer
Abstract
Summary: A histopathological study of 703 surgical specimens from patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum revealed invasion of veins by primary growth in almost 52 per cent. Follow-up studies on the patients showed that the corrected 5-year survival rate was significantly worse and liver metastases developed more frequently when venous invasion was present. Invasion of extramural veins was particularly significant whereas spread confined to intramural veins was less important. Invasion of large (thickwalled) veins was of greater consequence than invasion of small (thin-walled) veins and spread into thick-walled extramural veins had the greatest adverse influence of all. Venous spread of tumour takes place in parallel with local spread as measured by the Dukes' stage but exerts an influence on prognosis independent of the Dukes' stage. Similarly, vein invasion parallels the number of lymph node metastases but appears to exert an independent influence on prognosis. Observation of venous spread provides a precise assessment of the likely behaviour of rectal carcinoma and supplements, but does not replace indices such as the Dukes' stage or the number of lymph node metastases in routine use. The implications for surgical technique and management are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?
Heald, R. J., Husband, E. M., & Ryall, R. D. H. (1982) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800691019 · Cited by 2,917
Brown, G., Radcliffe, A. G., Newcombe, R. G., Dallimore, N. S., Bourne, M. W., & Williams, G. T. (2003) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4034 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Talbot, I. C., Ritchie, S., Leighton, M. H., Hughes, A. O., Bussey, H. J. R., & Morson, B. C.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-06-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 439-442
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1988705192
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800670619
- The paper
- Talbot, I. C., Ritchie, S., Leighton, M. H., Hughes, A. O., Bussey, H. J. R., & Morson, B. C. (1980). The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800670619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.