The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer
Abstract
The quality of life for patients with carcinoma of the lower two-thirds of the rectum (5–12 cm from the anal verge) treated by abdominoperineal resection (APER, n = 38) was compared with that of a similar group of patients treated by low sphincter saving resection (SSR, n = 40). Assessment was by questionnaire conducted a minimum of one year after operation. Thirty patients (75 percent) after SSR were entirely continent and ten patients (25 percent) had occasional episodes of incontinence. Each patient with a colostomy was incontinent and 25 (66 per cent) had leaks from their appliance (12 frequent; 13 occasional). Patients after APER avoided more items in the diet and took more medication to control their bowel habit than patients after SSR. Fifteen of the 18 patients (83 percent) who were employed before SSR returned to work after operation; only 6 of 15 patients (40 percent) returned to work after APER (P < 0.05). Sexual function was impaired in 6 of 20 men (30 percent) after SSR and in 12 of 18 men (67 percent) after APER (P < 0.06). Depression was significantly more prevalent after APER than after SSR. Patients with low rectal cancer who are treated by modern sphincter saving resection have a quality of life superior to those who are treated by APER.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Garcia-Aguilar, J., Chow, O. S., Smith, D. D., Marcet, J. E., Cataldo, P. A., Varma, M. G., Kumar, A. S., Oommen, S., Coutsoftides, T., Hunt, S. R., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00004-2 · Cited by 697
Bryant, C. L., Lunniss, P. J., Knowles, C. H., Thaha, M. A., & Chan, C. L. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70236-x · Cited by 640
The quality of life of cancer patients: A review of the literature
de Haes, J. C. J. M., & van Knippenberg, F. C. E. (1985) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(85)90335-1 · Cited by 366
Grumann, M. M., Noack, E. M., Hoffmann, I. A., & Schlag, P. M. (2001) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200102000-00001 · Cited by 314
Lindsey, I., Guy, R. J., Warren, B. F., & Mortensen, N. J. M. (2000) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01542.x · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, N. S., & Johnston, D.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-08-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 460-462
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2129133229
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800700805
- The paper
- Williams, N. S., & Johnston, D. (1983). The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800700805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.