The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture
Abstract
The Large Bowel Cancer Project is a collaborative prospective study of 4228 patients with a histologically proven adenocarcinoma, of whom 2336 (55 per cent) survived a ‘curative’ resection. Follow-up information is available on 2220 patients (95 per cent). Subsequently, 309 (14 per cent) have developed a local recurrence confirmed by: biopsy (127; 41 per cent), clinical examination (77; 25 per cent), X-ray (15; 5 per cent), a raised CEA (2; 1 per cent), or some other method — e.g. CT scan or a confident unbiopsied laparotomy finding (88; 29 per cent). Statistically significant factors (χ2 test, P<0·05) associated with local recurrence are: Dukes' classification: A 4 per cent; B 13 per cent; C 18 per cent Tumour differentiation: Well 11 per cent; Moderate 14 per cent; Poor 21 per cent Obstruction: Absent 13 per cent; Present 21 per cent Perforation: Absent 13 per cent; Present 28 per cent Tumour mobility: Freely mobile 11 per cent; Others 21 per cent Operation performed (rectal and rectosigmoid tumours): Abdomino-perineal 12 per cent; Anterior resection 18 per cent; Surgeon (Consultant only): Range < 5 per cent to > 20 per cent. Stratification of the above variables altered only the statistical significance pertaining to tumour differentiation (P < 0·1, d.f. = 2). In particular, the differences between Consultant surgeons remained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer
Kapiteijn, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Putter, H., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J. T., Pahlman, L., Glimelius, B., van Krieken, J. H. J. M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010580 · Cited by 4,205
Chemotherapy with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
Bosset, J.-F., Collette, L., Calais, G., Mineur, L., Maingon, P., Radosevic-Jelic, L., Daban, A., Bardet, E., Beny, A., & Ollier, J.-C. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa060829 · Cited by 2,688
Kapiteijn, E., Putter, H., & van de Velde, C. J. H. (2002) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02196.x · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, R. K. S., Hittinger, R., Blesovsky, L., Fry, J. S., & Fielding, L. P.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-16
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2085405721
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800710104
- The paper
- Phillips, R. K. S., Hittinger, R., Blesovsky, L., Fry, J. S., & Fielding, L. P. (1984). Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800710104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.