The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determinants of survival in liver resection for colorectal secondaries
Abstract
All 72 resections for colorectal liver secondaries during the period 1971–1984 were analysed retrospectively. Liver tumours were single in 35 (49 per cent), unilateral in 55 (76 per cent) and associated with extrahepatic disease in 12 (18 per cent) patients. Operative mortality was 5.6 per cent. With respect to the disease in the liver, the presence or absence of four or more metastases was the predominant prognostic determinant with a 5 year survival rate of 20 per cent in patients with less than four liver tumours, and no 3 year survivor among patients with four or more tumours. When the number of liver tumours was less than four, the prognosis in patients with unilateral disease was not significantly better than in patients with bilateral disease (P = 0.19). No other liver disease variable seemed to play any role in the prognosis. Extrahepatic disease was associated with a poor prognosis and no 5 year survivor. The length of the tumour-free resection margin was the only treatment variable that varied with the outcome: a resection margin of < 10 mm was followed by a poor survival. Variables that did not influence survival included uni- or bilateral disease, liver tumour volume, tumour size, type of liver resection, Dukes' classification, differentiation of the primary tumour and synchronous or metachronous disease. It is concluded that resection for liver colorectal secondaries is indicated when (a) there are less than four liver tumours, even if bilateral, (b) no extrahepatic disease is present, and (c) a resection margin of at least 10 mm can be obtained. It should not be performed unless all of these requirements are met.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resection of colorectal liver metastases
Scheele, J., Stang, R., Altendorf‐Hofmann, A., & Paul, M. (1995) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf00316981 · Cited by 1,539
Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: Impact of surgical resection on the natural history
Scheele, J., Stangl, R., & Altendorf-Hofmann, A. (1990) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800771115 · Cited by 836
Leonard, G. D., Brenner, B., & Kemeny, N. E. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.349 · Cited by 314
Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases
Xu, F., Tang, B., Jin, T.-Q., & Dai, C.-L. (2018) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.716 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekberg, H., Tranberg, K.-G., Andersson, R., Lundstedt, C., Hägerstrand, I., Ranstam, J., & Bengmark, S.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-09-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 727-731
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2118768896
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of survival in liver resection for colorectal secondaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800730917
- The paper
- Ekberg, H., Tranberg, K.-G., Andersson, R., Lundstedt, C., Hägerstrand, I., Ranstam, J., & Bengmark, S. (1986). Determinants of survival in liver resection for colorectal secondaries. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800730917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.