The DOI matches its Crossref record.
C-reactive protein, antiproteases and complement factors as objective markers of severity in acute pancreatitis
Abstract
In a series of patients with acute pancreatitis we have studied complement factors, antiproteases (α2-macroglobulin and α2-antiprotease) and C-reactive protein to determine the value of their sequential measurement in the prediction of outcome relative to clinical assessment and current multiple factor scoring systems. Complement factors were unhelpful in predicting the severity of an attack. α2-Macroglobulin levels were significantly lower in complicated attacks during days 3–8 and α1-antiprotease levels were significantly higher during days 4–8. C-reactive protein concentrations showed the best discrimination between mild and complicated attacks, levels rising higher and persisting for longer in complicated attacks; these differences were highly significant from day 2 (the morning after admission) to day 8. The concentrations providing the best discrimination were found to be ⩾ 210 mg/l for the peak C-reactive protein (on the second, third or fourth day) and ⩾ 120 mg/l for the C-reactive protein at the end of the first week. Analysis demonstrated both the peak or seventh-day C-reactive protein concentration to be of similar accuracy to either the Ranson or Glasgow multiple factor scoring systems and slightly better for attacks associated with gallstones. The C-reactive protein assay is simple, quick to perform, provides useful clinical information and is more likely to be of value and to be adopted into routine clinical practice than multiple factor scoring systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clyne, B., & Olshaker, J. S. (1999) · The Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00135-3 · Cited by 668
Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Greenberg, J. A., Hsu, J., Bawazeer, M., Marshall, J., Friedrich, J. O., Nathens, A., Coburn, N., May, G. R., Pearsall, E., & McLeod, R. S. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1503/cjs.015015 · Cited by 429
A critical evaluation of laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis
Yadav, D. (2002) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(02)04122-9 · Cited by 375
Management of the critically ill patient with severe acute pancreatitis
Nathens, A. B., Curtis, J. R., Beale, R. J., Cook, D. J., Moreno, R. P., Romand, J.-A., Skerrett, S. J., Stapleton, R. D., Ware, L. B., & Waldmann, C. S. (2004) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000148222.09869.92 · Cited by 357
Early Nasogastric Feeding in Predicted Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Clinical, Randomized Study
Eckerwall, G. E., Axelsson, J. B., & Andersson, R. G. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000246866.01930.58 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, C., Heads, A., Shenkin, A., & Imrie, C. W.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-02-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-181
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2118358728
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: C-reactive protein, antiproteases and complement factors as objective markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800760224
- The paper
- Wilson, C., Heads, A., Shenkin, A., & Imrie, C. W. (1989). C-reactive protein, antiproteases and complement factors as objective markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800760224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.