Long acting somatostatin analogue in dumping syndrome
Abstract
The effect of long acting somatostatin analogue, SMS 201-995, on postprandial dumping syndrome was studied in eight patients with Billroth II gastric resection. Each patient was subjected to two oral glucose challenges with 75 g glucose. One challenge was premedicated with 50 micrograms SMS 201-995 subcutaneously 15 min before the oral intake of glucose, the other with placebo. With placebo all patients experienced the subjective symptoms of the early dumping syndrome with significant (P less than 0.001) increases (mean (s.d.)) in pulse rate (from 66 (8) to 102 (10) beats/min), in packed cell volume (from 0.36 (0.05) to 0.43 (0.1) l/l) and in the plasma levels of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (from 3.0 (0.5) to 10.2 (1.8) pmol/l). During the somatostatin study the subjective symptoms and the changes in the various parameters were not detected. In the control study seven patients showed postprandial hypoglycemia. In these patients significant elevations (P less than 0.001) in the insulin level (from 10 (0.9) to 40 (9.1) microE/ml) and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) concentration (from 100 (13) to 220 (41) ng/l) were seen, compared with the initial values. During the application of SMS 201-995 hypoglycaemia did not develop and plasma insulin and GIP concentrations remained unchanged. These results indicate that the long acting somatostatin analogue alleviates the symptoms of early and late postprandial dumping syndromes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Short-acting formulations may be more effective at improving some dumping symptoms such as hypoglycemia.
“Short-acting formulations may be more effective at improving some dumping symptoms such as hypoglycemia (15,(81)(82)(83)85); however, the need for repeated injections throughout the day is often a major limitation to the long-term administration of short-acting”
From Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management (2017) · cites this paper as [82]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 10 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Tulassay, Z., Tulassay, T., Gupta, R., & Cierny, G.
- Affiliations
- Semmelweis University (HU)
- University of Utah (US)
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital Ebersberg , FRG
- Corresponding author
- Tulassay, Z
- ORCID
- Tulassay, Z
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1294-1295
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1984161236
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- British journal of surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation Bad Godesberg, FRG
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- somatostatin analogues, SMS 201-995, postprandial hypoglycemia, vasoactive intestinal peptide, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, insulin, oral glucose tolerance
- MeSH terms
- Double-Blind Method, Dumping Syndrome, Gastrointestinal Hormones, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Octreotide, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review