The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: Actual versus perceived risks
Abstract
A collective critical review of the literature on postsplenectomy sepsis from 1952 to 1987 has been undertaken. The reports cover a cohort of 12 514 patients undergoing splenectomy but of these only 5902 reports were sufficiently detailed to allow a useful analysis. The incidence of infection after splenectomy in children under 16 years old was 4.4 per cent with a mortality rate of 2.2 per cent. The corresponding figures for adults were 0.9 per cent and 0.8 per cent respectively. The present analysis of well documented patients has shown that severe infection after splenectomy for benign disease is very uncommon except in infants (infection rate 15.7 per cent) and children below the age of 5 years (infection rate 10.4 per cent). Many of these reported postsplenectomy infections may have been coincidental. It is also apparent that children contract a different type of infection after splenectomy than adults, predominantly a meningitis which is less frequently fatal. Adults, in contrast, appear to develop a septicaemic type of illness associated with a higher mortality rate. This survey has also shown that children are reported to be no more susceptible to pneumococcal sepsis than to infection caused by any other organism. Although the removal of the spleen in otherwise normal people does not appear to be associated with an increased frequency of infection, the presence of a coexistent disorder, notably hepatic disease, can increase the risk substantially.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kubes, P., & Jenne, C. (2018) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052415 · Cited by 923
Pillai, S., Cariappa, A., & Moran, S. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115728 · Cited by 466
OVERWHELMING POSTSPLENECTOMY INFECTION
Lynch, A. M., & Kapila, R. (1996) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70322-6 · Cited by 264
Natural resistance, iron and infection: a challenge for clinical medicine
Bullen, J. J., Rogers, H. J., Spalding, P. B., & Ward, C. G. (2006) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.46386-0 · Cited by 163
Laws, H.-J., Baumann, U., Bogdan, C., Burchard, G., Christopeit, M., Hecht, J., Heininger, U., Hilgendorf, I., Kern, W., Kling, K., et al. (2020) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-020-03123-w · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Holdsworth, R. J., Irving, A. D., & Cuschieri, A.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-09-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1031-1038
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2140253684
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: Actual versus perceived risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800780904
- The paper
- Holdsworth, R. J., Irving, A. D., & Cuschieri, A. (1991). Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: Actual versus perceived risks. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800780904
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.