The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A prospective assessment and current perspective
Abstract
Between August 1991 and June 1993, 74 laparoscopic and laparoscopically assisted colonic and rectal operations were performed. A variety of procedures were carried out including 32 total abdominal colectomies (group 1), 32 segmental resections (group 2) and ten constructions of a diverting stoma without formal resection (group 3). Indications for surgery were mucosal ulcerative colitis in 20 patients, carcinoma in 12, polyposis in six, Crohn's disease in seven and other conditions in the remaining 29. The 74 comprised 42 male and 32 female patients of mean age 45 (range 12–88) years. The median (range) duration of the procedure was 3·0 (1·0–6·5) h for the entire group, 3·9 (2·5–6·5) h for group 1, 2·9 (1·5–5·5) h for group 2 and 1·8 (1·0–2·5) h for group 3. The median (range) length of ileus was 3·0 (2–7) days overall; respective times for groups 1–3 were 3·5 (2–7), 3·0 (2–7) and 2·0 (1–4) days. The median (range) length of hospitalization was 7·0 (2–40) days, 8·1 (4–19) days in group 1, 7·0 (4–20) days in group 2 and 6·0 (2–40) days in group 3. Ten patients (14 per cent) developed intraoperative and 15 (20 per cent) postoperative complications; there were no deaths. These results failed to confirm any significant advantages of laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery. Specifically, neither the operating time, nor length of ileus, nor length of hospitalization was improved over standard procedures. Advances in technology and surgical technique may improve such findings in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy
Wexner, S. D., & Cohen, S. M. (1995) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800820305 · Cited by 561
Self-citationKhoshbaten, M., Ghaffarifar, S., Jabbar Imani, A., & Shahnazi, T. (2013) · Digestive Endoscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01347.x · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Wexner, S. D., Cohen, S. M., Johansen, O. B., Nogueras, J. J., & Jagelman, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-12-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1602-1605
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2073006108
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A prospective assessment and current perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800801238
- The paper
- Wexner, S. D., Cohen, S. M., Johansen, O. B., Nogueras, J. J., & Jagelman, D. G. (1993). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A prospective assessment and current perspective. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800801238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.