The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system
Abstract
POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Morbidity and mortality) has been studied as a possible surgical audit system for a 9-month interval using a sample of 28 per cent of the general surgical workload. Mortality or survival was analysed as an endpoint. In this sample the published POSSUM predictor equation for mortality overpredicted deaths by a factor of more than two. The bulk of the overprediction occurred in the group at lowest risk (predicted mortality 10 per cent or less), in which death was overpredicted by a factor of six. This is the most important group for audit purposes since it contains the majority of surgical patients and is composed of fit patients undergoing minor surgery. The published predictor equation for mortality returns a minimum predicted mortality of 1·08 per cent, clearly far higher than that expected for a fit patient having minor surgery. Logistic regression was done on a set of 1485 surgical episodes to generate a local predictor equation for mortality. This process gave a predictor equation that fitted well with the observed mortality rate and gave a minimum predicted risk of mortality of 0·20 per cent. The previously published POSSUM predictor equation for mortality performed badly when tested using a standard test of goodness of fit for logistic regression and must be modified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
A REVIEW OF GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS1
LEMESHOW, S., & HOSMER, D. W. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113284 · Cited by 1,947
Cited by
De Hert, S., Staender, S., Fritsch, G., Hinkelbein, J., Afshari, A., Bettelli, G., Bock, M., Chew, M. S., Coburn, M., De Robertis, E., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000000817 · Cited by 389
Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
Protopapa, K. L., Simpson, J. C., Smith, N. C. E., & Moonesinghe, S. R. (2014) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9638 · Cited by 305
Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery
Prytherch, D. R., Sutton, G. L., & Boyle, J. R. (2001) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01820.x · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Whiteley, M. S., Prytherch, D. R., Higgins, B., Weaver, P. C., & Prout, W. G.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-06-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 812-815
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2050636348
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800830628
- The paper
- Whiteley, M. S., Prytherch, D. R., Higgins, B., Weaver, P. C., & Prout, W. G. (1996). An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800830628
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.