The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiotherapy reduces recurrence rates after surgery for rectal cancer but other variables may also affect outcome. The Stockholm Rectal Cancer Study Group has conducted two prospective randomized trials on preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. METHODS: This study analysed postoperative morbidity and mortality, local recurrence rate and death from rectal cancer in 1399 patients, according to different hospital- and surgeon-related factors. RESULTS: Patients operated on by surgeons who were certified specialists for at least 10 years had a lower risk of local recurrence (relative risk 0.8 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.6-1.0)) and death from rectal cancer (relative risk 0.8 (95 per cent c.i. 0.7-0.9)). The risk was also lower for patients operated on in university hospitals (relative risk of local recurrence 0.7 (95 per cent c.i. 0.5-0.9), relative risk of death from rectal cancer 0.8 (95 per cent c.i. 0.7-1.0)) compared with community hospitals, although the results in some community hospitals were similar to those in university hospitals. The proportional reduction of local recurrence rate after preoperative radiotherapy was not significantly different for the studied institutions and surgeons. CONCLUSION: There was a significant surgeon-related variation in patient outcome, which is probably related to the surgical technique. Although improved technique may reduce the local recurrence rate, preoperative radiotherapy is still beneficial concerning local control and survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Francois, Y., Nemoz, C. J., Baulieux, J., Vignal, J., Grandjean, J.-P., Partensky, C., Souquet, J. C., Adeleine, P., & Gerard, J.-P. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2396 · Cited by 815
A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome
Chowdhury, M. M., Dagash, H., & Pierro, A. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5714 · Cited by 608
Wibe, A., Syse, A., Andersen, E., Tretli, S., Myrvold, H. E., & Søreide, O. (2004) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/s10350-003-0012-y · Cited by 425
Workload and surgeon´s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery
Archampong, D., Borowski, D., Wille-Jørgensen, P., & Iversen, L. H. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005391.pub3 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Holm, T., Johansson, H., Cedermark, B., Ekelund, G., & Rutqvist, L.-E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 657-663
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2063776175
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800840520
- The paper
- Holm, T., Johansson, H., Cedermark, B., Ekelund, G., & Rutqvist, L.-E. (1997). Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800840520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.