The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether leakage from a colorectal anastomosis following potentially curative anterior resection for rectal cancer is an independent risk factor for local recurrence. Methods: The study included all patients who had a potentially curative anterior resection with anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the rectum between 1971 and 1991 at Concord Hospital. The data were collected prospectively, with complete follow-up for at least 5 years. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare time to recurrence between strata of categorical variables. Proportional hazards regression was used in multivariate modelling. Results: There were 403 patients in the study. After adjustment for lymph node metastases, the distal resection margin of resection, non-total anatomical dissection of the rectum and the level of anastomosis, multivariate analysis identified a significant association between anastomotic leakage and local recurrence (hazard ratio 3·8, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·8 to 7·9). Conclusion: Leakage following a colorectal anastomosis after potentially curative resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum is an independent predictor of local recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Survival with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Resectable Rectal Cancer
(1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704033361402 · Cited by 2,517
Cited by
Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer
Peeters, K. C. M. J., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Marijnen, C. A. M., Klein Kranenbarg, E., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J., & van de Velde, C. J. H. (2005) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4806 · Cited by 659
Eriksen, M. T., Wibe, A., Norstein, J., Haffner, J., Wiig, J. N., & the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2005) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x · Cited by 351
Jafari, M. D., Lee, K. H., Halabi, W. J., Mills, S. D., Carmichael, J. C., Stamos, M. J., & Pigazzi, A. (2013) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2832-8 · Cited by 337
Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
Montedori, A., Cirocchi, R., Farinella, E., Sciannameo, F., & Abraha, I. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006878.pub2 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, S. W., Walker, K. G., Rickard, M. J. F. X., Sinclair, G., Dent, O. F., Chapuis, P. H., & Bokey, E. L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1261-1266
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2045787558
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.