Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival

McArdle, C S, Hole, D J·2004·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported that emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor outcome. Many of these studies were small and most were not adjusted for case mix. The aim of this study was to establish, after adjusting for case mix, the magnitude of the differences in postoperative mortality and survival between patients undergoing elective surgery and those presenting as an emergency. Methods: Three thousand two hundred patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1994 in Scotland were studied. Five-year survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios were calculated. Results: Some 1603 (72·4 per cent) of 2214 elective patients had a potentially curative resection compared with 632 (64·1 per cent) of 986 patients who presented as an emergency (P < 0·001). Following curative resection, the postoperative mortality rate was 2·8 per cent after elective and 8·2 per cent after emergency operation (P < 0·001). Overall survival at 5 years was 57·5 per cent after elective and 39·1 per cent after emergency curative surgery (P < 0·001); cancer-specific survival at 5 years was 70·9 and 52·9 per cent respectively (P < 0·001). The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival after emergency relative to elective surgery was 1·68 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·49 to 1·90; P < 0·001) and that for cancer-specific survival was 1·90 (95 per cent c.i. 1·62 to 2·22; P < 0·001). Conclusion: Following apparently curative resection for colorectal cancer, there was an excess of both cancer-related and intercurrent deaths in patients who presented as an emergency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.4456

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
McArdle, C. S., & Hole, D. J.
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2004-03-22
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
605-609
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W2095228410
Cited by
346
References
1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.4456
The paper
McArdle, C. S., & Hole, D. J. (2004). Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4456

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.