The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Malignant potential of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas
Abstract
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas are rare malignant lesions of the pancreas that typically occur in young women. Large series from any one centre are notably absent in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine long-term outcomes of operative therapy. Methods: The records of all 14 patients diagnosed with pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas over 17 years were reviewed. Results: Thirteen of the 14 patients were female and the mean age at diagnosis was 30 years. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm was suspected in only half of these patients before operation. On computed tomography, ultrasonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, three lesions were solid, three were largely cystic, and five had solid and cystic components. All 14 patients underwent surgical exploration and curative resections were possible in 13, including distal pancreatectomy in nine, pancreaticoduodenectomy in three and resection of a local intraperitoneal recurrence in one patient. After follow-up ranging from 3 months to 20 years, 12 patients were alive, including one who had undergone re-exploration and resection of local and subcutaneous recurrences 9 years previously. Conclusion: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any solid or partly cystic pancreatic mass in women aged less than 35 years. An attempt at en bloc resection without formal lymphadenectomy should be undertaken, including resection of synchronous or metachronous distant metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
European experts consensus statement on cystic tumours of the pancreas
Del Chiaro, M., Verbeke, C., Salvia, R., Klöppel, G., Werner, J., McKay, C., Friess, H., Manfredi, R., Van Cutsem, E., Löhr, M., et al. (2013) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2013.01.010 · Cited by 498
Reddy, S., Cameron, J. L., Scudiere, J., Hruban, R. H., Fishman, E. K., Ahuja, N., Pawlik, T. M., Edil, B. H., Schulick, R. D., & Wolfgang, C. L. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.044 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Tipton, S. G., Smyrk, T. C., Sarr, M. G., & Thompson, G. B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-11
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 733-737
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2049316378
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Malignant potential of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.5334
- The paper
- Tipton, S. G., Smyrk, T. C., Sarr, M. G., & Thompson, G. B. (2006). Malignant potential of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.