Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 681

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery

Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) study group, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group, Wind, J, Polle, S W, Fung Kon Jin, P H P, Dejong, C H C, von Meyenfeldt, M F, Ubbink, D T, Gouma, D J, Bemelman, W A·2006·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: Fast track (FT) programmes optimize perioperative care in an attempt to accelerate recovery, reduce morbidity and shorten hospital stay. The aim of this review was to assess FT programmes for elective segmental colonic resections. Methods: A systematic review was performed of all randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials on FT colonic surgery. The main endpoints were number of applied FT elements, hospital stay, readmission rate, morbidity and mortality. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by three observers. Results: Six papers were eligible for analysis (three randomized controlled and three controlled clinical trials), including 512 patients. FT programmes contained a mean of nine (range four to 12) of the 17 FT elements as defined in the literature. Primary hospital stay (weighted mean difference − 1·56 days, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) − 2·61 to − 0·50 days) and morbidity (relative risk 0·54, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·69) were significantly lower for FT programmes. Readmission rates were not significantly different (relative risk 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 1·86). No increase in mortality was found. Conclusions: FT appears to be safe and shortens hospital stay after elective colorectal surgery. However, as the evidence is limited, a multicentre randomized trial seems justified.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.5384

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 681

Metadata

Authors
Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) study group, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group, Wind, J., Polle, S. W., Fung Kon Jin, P. H. P., Dejong, C. H. C., von Meyenfeldt, M. F., Ubbink, D. T., Gouma, D. J., & Bemelman, W. A.
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2006-06-14
Volume
93
Issue
7
Pages
800-809
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W2166825115
Cited by
681
References
0
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.5384
The paper
Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) study group, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group, Wind, J., Polle, S. W., Fung Kon Jin, P. H. P., Dejong, C. H. C., von Meyenfeldt, M. F., Ubbink, D. T., Gouma, D. J., & Bemelman, W. A. (2006). Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5384

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.