The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Swedish rectal cancer registry
Abstract
Background: An audit of all patients with rectal cancer in Sweden was launched in 1995. This is the first report from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry (SRCR). Methods: Between 1995 and 2003, 13 434 patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the rectum were registered with the SRCR; there were approximately 1500 new patients annually. Results: Approximately half had an anterior resection, a quarter an abdominoperineal resection and 15 per cent a Hartmann's procedure. The median 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2·4 per cent and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 35·0 per cent. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 62·3 per cent. The 5-year relative survival rate was 70·1 per cent after anterior resection, 59·8 per cent after abdominoperineal resection and 39·8 per cent after a Hartmann's procedure. The crude 5-year local recurrence rate was 9·5 per cent overall, 6·1 per cent after preoperative radiotherapy and 11·4 per cent after surgery alone. For 3868 patients who had a locally curative procedure the local recurrence rate was 7·4 per cent overall, 5·9 per cent for those who had radiotherapy and 10·2 per cent for those who did not. The local recurrence rate was 2·9 per cent (28 of 968) for stage I disease, 7·9 per cent (112 of 1418) for stage II, 13·9 per cent (188 of 1357) for stage III and 8·5 per cent (45 of 532) for stage IV. Conclusion: These good population-based results are due, in part, to the nationwide prospective quality assurance registration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hao (2015) · doi:10.1002/14651858 · Cited by 11,321
Improved Survival with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Resectable Rectal Cancer
(1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704033361402 · Cited by 2,517
Cited by
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Rutegård, J., Simert, G., & Sjödahl, R. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3180603024 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationGlobal cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery
Sullivan, R., Alatise, O. I., Anderson, B. O., Audisio, R., Autier, P., Aggarwal, A., Balch, C., Brennan, M. F., Dare, A., D'Cruz, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00223-5 · Cited by 697
Erlandsson, J., Holm, T., Pettersson, D., Berglund, Å., Cedermark, B., Radu, C., Johansson, H., Machado, M., Hjern, F., Hallböök, O., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30086-4 · Cited by 624
Self-citationHorvat, N., Veeraraghavan, H., Khan, M., Blazic, I., Zheng, J., Capanu, M., Sala, E., Garcia-Aguilar, J., Gollub, M. J., & Petkovska, I. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172300 · Cited by 355
Nilsson, P. J., van Etten, B., Hospers, G. A., Påhlman, L., van de Velde, C. J., Beets-Tan, R. G., Blomqvist, L., Beukema, J. C., Kapiteijn, E., Marijnen, C. A., et al. (2013) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-279 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Påhlman, L., Bohe, M., Cedermark, B., Dahlberg, M., Lindmark, G., Sjödahl, R., Öjerskog, B., Damber, L., & Johansson, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-27
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1285-1292
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2111362587
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.