Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors for faecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment

cooperative clinical investigators of the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision trial, Lange, M M, den Dulk, M, Bossema, E R, Maas, C P, Peeters, K C M J, Rutten, H J, Klein Kranenbarg, E, Marijnen, C A M, van de Velde, C J H·2007·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: Low anterior resection (LAR) may result in faecal incontinence. This study aimed to identify risk factors for long-term faecal incontinence after total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without preoperative radiotherapy (PRT). Methods: Between 1996 and 1999, patients with operable rectal cancer were randomized to TME with or without PRT. Eligible patients who underwent LAR were studied retrospectively at 2 years (399 patients) and 5 years (339) after TME. Results: At 5 years after surgery faecal incontinence was reported by 61·5 per cent of patients who had PRT and 38·8 per cent of those who did not (P < 0·001). Excessive blood loss and height of the tumour were associated with long-term faecal incontinence, but only in patients treated with PRT. Conclusion: Faecal incontinence is likely to occur after PRT and TME, especially when the perineum is irradiated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bjs.5819

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
cooperative clinical investigators of the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision trial, Lange, M. M., den Dulk, M., Bossema, E. R., Maas, C. P., Peeters, K. C. M. J., Rutten, H. J., Klein Kranenbarg, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., & van de Velde, C. J. H.
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2007-06-19
Volume
94
Issue
10
Pages
1278-1284
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W1971838125
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.