The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer can avoid mastectomy by shrinkage of tumour volume. This review assesses the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on clinical outcome. Methods: All randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer were reviewed systematically and meta-analyses were performed. Results: Fourteen studies randomizing 5500 women were eligible for analysis. Overall survival was equivalent in both groups. In the neoadjuvant group, the mastectomy rate was lower (relative risk 0·71 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·67 to 0·75)) without hampering local control (hazard ratio 1·12 (95 per cent c.i. 0·92 to 1·37)). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated fewer adverse effects. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an established treatment option for early breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
Deeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Bradburn, M. J. (2001) · Systematic Reviews in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15 · Cited by 2,163
McAuley, L., Pham, B., Tugwell, P., & Moher, D. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02786-0 · Cited by 812
Cited by
Asselain, B., Barlow, W., Bartlett, J., Bergh, J., Bergsten-Nordström, E., Bliss, J., Boccardo, F., Boddington, C., Bogaerts, J., Bonadonna, G., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30777-5 · Cited by 1,118
Self-citationSpring, L. M., Fell, G., Arfe, A., Sharma, C., Greenup, R., Reynolds, K. L., Smith, B. L., Alexander, B., Moy, B., Isakoff, S. J., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3492 · Cited by 938
MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment
Morrow, M., Waters, J., & Morris, E. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61350-0 · Cited by 448
von Minckwitz, G., Untch, M., Nüesch, E., Loibl, S., Kaufmann, M., Kümmel, S., Fasching, P. A., Eiermann, W., Blohmer, J.-U., Costa, S. D., et al. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1228-x · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Mieog, J. S. D., van der Hage, J. A., & van de Velde, C. J. H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-08-13
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1189-1200
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2135753253
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
