The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: To address issues regarding the fractionation of radiotherapy (RT) and timing of surgery for rectal cancer, a multicentre trial has randomized patients to preoperative short-course RT with two different intervals to surgery, or long-course RT with delayed surgery. The present interim analysis assessed feasibility, compliance and complications after RT and surgery. Methods: Some 303 patients were randomized to either short-course RT (5 × 5 Gy) and surgery within 1 week (group 1), short-course RT and surgery after 4–8 weeks (group 2) or long-course RT (25 × 2 Gy) and surgery after 4–8 weeks (group 3). Results: Demographic data were similar between groups and there were few protocol violations (5·0–6 per cent). Eight patients (2·6 per cent) developed radiation-induced acute toxicity. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between groups (46·6, 40·0 and 32 per cent in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively; P = 0·164). Patients receiving short-course RT with surgery 11–17 days after the start of RT had the highest complication rate (24 of 37). Conclusion: Compliance was acceptable and severe acute toxicity was low, irrespective of fractionation. Short-course RT with immediate surgery had a tendency towards more postoperative complications, but only if surgery was delayed beyond 10 days after the start of RT. Registration number: NCT00904813 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer
Kapiteijn, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Putter, H., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J. T., Pahlman, L., Glimelius, B., van Krieken, J. H. J. M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010580 · Cited by 4,205
Self-citationImproved Survival with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Resectable Rectal Cancer
(1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704033361402 · Cited by 2,517
Bujko, K., Nowacki, M. P., Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A., Michalski, W., Bebenek, M., & Kryj, M. (2006) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5506 · Cited by 1,244
(2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06409-1 · Cited by 870
Cited by
van Gijn, W., Marijnen, C. A., Nagtegaal, I. D., Kranenbarg, E. M.-K., Putter, H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J., Påhlman, L., Glimelius, B., & van de Velde, C. J. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70097-3 · Cited by 1,888
Self-citationErlandsson, J., Holm, T., Pettersson, D., Berglund, Å., Cedermark, B., Radu, C., Johansson, H., Machado, M., Hjern, F., Hallböök, O., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30086-4 · Cited by 624
Self-citationBregendahl, S., Emmertsen, K. J., Lous, J., & Laurberg, S. (2013) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.12244 · Cited by 332
Nilsson, P. J., van Etten, B., Hospers, G. A., Påhlman, L., van de Velde, C. J., Beets-Tan, R. G., Blomqvist, L., Beukema, J. C., Kapiteijn, E., Marijnen, C. A., et al. (2013) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-279 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettersson, D., Cedermark, B., Holm, T., Radu, C., Påhlman, L., Glimelius, B., & Martling, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 580-587
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2111510200
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.