The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes
Abstract
Consensus abstract: Background: The management of primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes (PRC-bTME) and recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) is challenging. There is global variation in standards and no guidelines exist. To achieve cure most patients require extended, multivisceral, exenterative surgery, beyond conventional total mesorectal excision planes. The aim of the Beyond TME Group was to achieve consensus on the definitions and principles of management, and to identify areas of research priority. Methods: Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus. The Group consisted of invited experts from surgery, radiology, oncology and pathology. The process included two international dedicated discussion conferences, formal feedback, three rounds of editing and two rounds of anonymized web-based voting. Consensus was achieved with more than 80 per cent agreement; less than 80 per cent agreement indicated low consensus. During conferences held in September 2011 and March 2012, open discussion took place on areas in which there is a low level of consensus. Results: The final consensus document included 51 voted statements, making recommendations on ten key areas of PRC-bTME and RRC. Consensus agreement was achieved on the recommendations of 49 statements, with 34 achieving consensus in over 95 per cent. The lowest level of consensus obtained was 76 per cent. There was clear identification of the need for referral to a specialist multidisciplinary team for diagnosis, assessment and further management. Conclusion: The consensus process has provided guidance for the management of patients with PRC-bTME or RRC, taking into account global variations in surgical techniques and technology. It has further identified areas of research priority.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer
Kapiteijn, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Putter, H., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J. T., Pahlman, L., Glimelius, B., van Krieken, J. H. J. M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010580 · Cited by 4,205
Self-citationChemotherapy with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
Bosset, J.-F., Collette, L., Calais, G., Mineur, L., Maingon, P., Radosevic-Jelic, L., Daban, A., Bardet, E., Beny, A., & Ollier, J.-C. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa060829 · Cited by 2,688
André, T., Boni, C., Navarro, M., Tabernero, J., Hickish, T., Topham, C., Bonetti, A., Clingan, P., Bridgewater, J., Rivera, F., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.6771 · Cited by 2,277
Sauer, R., Liersch, T., Merkel, S., Fietkau, R., Hohenberger, W., Hess, C., Becker, H., Raab, H.-R., Villanueva, M.-T., Witzigmann, H., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.40.1836 · Cited by 2,095
Van Cutsem, E., Köhne, C.-H., Láng, I., Folprecht, G., Nowacki, M. P., Cascinu, S., Shchepotin, I., Maurel, J., Cunningham, D., Tejpar, S., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.33.5091 · Cited by 1,882
Effective Surgical Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Rectal Carcinoma
Krook, J. E., Moertel, C. G., Gunderson, L. L., Wieand, H. S., Collins, R. T., Beart, R. W., Kubista, T. P., Poon, M. A., Meyers, W. C., Mailliard, J. A., et al. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199103143241101 · Cited by 1,879
The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00018-7 · Cited by 1,789
Gérard, J.-P., Conroy, T., Bonnetain, F., Bouché, O., Chapet, O., Closon-Dejardin, M.-T., Untereiner, M., Leduc, B., Francois, É., Maurel, J., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.7629 · Cited by 1,731
A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines
Harbour, R., & Miller, J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334 · Cited by 1,637
Bujko, K., Nowacki, M. P., Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A., Michalski, W., Bebenek, M., & Kryj, M. (2006) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5506 · Cited by 1,244
Metadata
- Authors
- Collaborative, T. B. T., Ali, S. M., Antoniou, A., Beynon, J., Bhangu, A., Bose, P., Boyle, K., Branagan, G., Brown, G., Burling, D., Chang, G. J., Clark, S. K., Colquhoun, P., Crane, C. H., Darzi, A., Das, P., de Wilt, J. H. W., Delaney, C. P., Desai, A., Davies, M., Dietz, D., Dozois, E. J., Duff, M., Dziki, A., Fitzgerald, J. E., Frizelle, F. A., George, B., George, M. L., Georgiou, P., Glynne-Jones, R., Goldin, R. D., Gupta, A., Harji, D., Harris, D. A., Hawkins, M., Heriot, A. G., Holm, T., Hompes, R., Jeys, L., Jenkins, J. T., Kiran, R. P., Koh, C. E., Laurberg, S., Law, W. L., Liberman, A. S., Marshall, M., McArthur, D. R., Mirnezami, A. H., Moran, B., Mortenson, N., Myers, E., Nicholls, R. J., O'Connell, P. R., O'Dwyer, S. T., Oliver, A., Pallan, A., Patel, P., Patel, U. B., Radley, S., Ramsey, K. W. D., Rasmussen, P. C., Richard, C., Rutten, H. J. T., Sagar, P., Sebag-Montefiore, D., Solomon, M. J., Stocchi, L., Swallow, C. J., Tait, D., Tan, E., Tekkis, P. P., van As, N., Vuong, T., Wiggers, T., Wilson, M., Winter, D., & Woodhouse, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-06-21
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- E1-E33
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1830195387
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.9192_1
- The paper
- Collaborative, T. B. T., Ali, S. M., Antoniou, A., Beynon, J., Bhangu, A., Bose, P., Boyle, K., Branagan, G., Brown, G., Burling, D., Chang, G. J., Clark, S. K., Colquhoun, P., Crane, C. H., Darzi, A., Das, P., de Wilt, J. H. W., Delaney, C. P., Desai, A., . . . Woodhouse, C. (2013). Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9192_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.