Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training assumes that skills are directly transferable to the patient-based setting, but few studies have correlated simulated performance with surgical performance. METHODS: A systematic search strategy was undertaken to find studies published since the last systematic review, published in 2007. Inclusion of articles was determined using a predetermined protocol, independent assessment by two reviewers and a final consensus decision. Studies that reported on the use of surgical simulation-based training and assessed the transferability of the acquired skills to a patient-based setting were included. RESULTS: Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials and seven non-randomized comparative studies were included. Fourteen studies investigated laparoscopic procedures, 13 endoscopic procedures and seven other procedures. These studies provided strong evidence that participants who reached proficiency in simulation-based training performed better in the patient-based setting than their counterparts who did not have simulation-based training. Simulation-based training was equally as effective as patient-based training for colonoscopy, laparoscopic camera navigation and endoscopic sinus surgery in the patient-based setting. CONCLUSION: These studies strengthen the evidence that simulation-based training, as part of a structured programme and incorporating predetermined proficiency levels, results in skills transfer to the operative setting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Skills acquired during rigorous simulation-based training can be transferred to the clinical setting.
“Skills acquired during rigorous simulation-based training can be transferred to the clinical setting11”
From Neurosurgery resident training using blended learning concepts: Course development and participant evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 485
- Authors
- Dawe, S. R., Pena, G. N., Windsor, J. A., Broeders, J. A. J. L., Cregan, P. C., Hewett, P. J., & Maddern, G. J.
- Affiliations
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Maddern, G J
- Venue
- British journal of surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-15
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1063-1076
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2043857563
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- British journal of surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- simulation-based training, skill transfer, surgical training, laparoscopic surgery, endoscopy, colonoscopy, endoscopic sinus surgery, proficiency level
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Clinical Trials as Topic, Computer Simulation, Endoscopy, Humans, Laparoscopy, General Surgery, Transfer, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review