The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robotic surgery
Abstract
Background: Proficiency in minimally invasive surgery requires intensive and continuous training, as it is technically challenging for unnatural visual and haptic perceptions. Robotic and computer sciences are producing innovations to augment the surgeon's skills to achieve accuracy and high precision during complex surgery. This article reviews the current use of robotically assisted surgery, focusing on technology as well as main applications in digestive surgery, and future perspectives. Methods: The PubMed database was interrogated to retrieve evidence-based data on surgical applications. Internal and external consulting with key opinion leaders, renowned robotics laboratories and robotic platform manufacturers was used to produce state-of-the art business intelligence around robotically assisted surgery. Results: Selected digestive procedures (oesophagectomy, gastric bypass, pancreatic and liver resections, rectal resection for cancer) might benefit from robotic assistance, although the current level of evidence is insufficient to support widespread adoption. The surgical robotic market is growing, and a variety of projects have recently been launched at both academic and corporate levels to develop lightweight, miniaturized surgical robotic prototypes. Conclusion: The magnified view, and improved ergonomics and dexterity offered by robotic platforms, might facilitate the uptake of minimally invasive procedures. Image guidance to complement robotically assisted procedures, through the concepts of augmented reality, could well represent a major revolution to increase safety and deal with difficulties associated with the new minimally invasive approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhanced-Reality Video Fluorescence: A Real-Time Assessment of Intestinal Viability
Diana, M., Noll, E., Diemunsch, P., Dallemagne, B., Benahmed, M. A., Agnus, V., Soler, L., Barry, B., Namer, I. J., Demartines, N., et al. (2014) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31828d4ab3 · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Cited by
Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery
Sullivan, R., Alatise, O. I., Anderson, B. O., Audisio, R., Autier, P., Aggarwal, A., Balch, C., Brennan, M. F., Dare, A., D'Cruz, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00223-5 · Cited by 697
Augmented Reality in Medicine: Systematic and Bibliographic Review
Eckert, M., Volmerg, J. S., & Friedrich, C. M. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/10967 · Cited by 336
Pelvic Organ Prolapse: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 214
(2019) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003519 · Cited by 187
Toward immersive communications in 6G
Shen, X. (., Gao, J., Li, M., Zhou, C., Hu, S., He, M., & Zhuang, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2022.1068478 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Diana, M., & Marescaux, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e15-e28
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W4235876038
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robotic surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.9711
- The paper
- Diana, M., & Marescaux, J. (2015). Robotic surgery. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.