Cited by 98Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressRedox biology and oxidative stressEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Quantification of malondialdehyde by HPLC‐FL – application to various biological samples

Domijan, Ana‐Marija, Ralić, Jovica, Radić Brkanac, Sandra, Rumora, Lada, Žanić‐Grubišić, Tihana·2015·Biomedical Chromatography

Abstract

Malondialdehyde (MDA) is stabile product of lipid peroxidation (LPO), and therefore MDA is frequently used as a biomarker of LPO. To determine MDA level in various biological samples (human plasma, fish liver tissue and cells in culture), we used an HPLC method with fluorescent detection based on 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) assay. The method was validated by the use of spiked pooled plasma samples. In tested concentration range (0.15-3.0 µmol/L) the method was linear (R(2) = 0.9963), the between-day variability (coefficient of variations, CVs) was between 4.7 and 7.6%, the within-day variability CVs was between 2.6 and 6.4% and recovery was between 91.2 and 107.6%. The level of MDA in human plasma (healthy male, non-smokers, 46.3 ± 4.7 years; N = 38) was 2.2 ± 1.4 µmol/L; that in liver tissue of common carp (Cyprinus carpio; N = 12) was 0.02 ± 0.004 µmol/g tissue, and in cultured cells (human laryngeal carcinoma cells; N = 10) it was 0.18 ± 0.02 nmol/mg proteins. The HPLC-FL method is rapid, accurate and reliable to follow the extent of LPO in various biological samples, particularly in samples in which a low level of MDA is expected, such as cells in culture. Owing to the rapid analytical process and run time, it can be used for routine analysis of MDA in clinical laboratory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bmc.3361

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further methods such as HPLC with UV or fluorescence detection have been developed to improve specificity of MDA measurement.

    “Beside this assay, further methods have been developed in order to improve the specificity of MDA measurement, such as HPLC combined with UV or fluorescence detection [182,184].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domijan, A., Ralić, J., Radić Brkanac, S., Rumora, L., & Žanić‐Grubišić, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Zagreb (HR)
  • Galapagos (Croatia) (HR)
  • University of Zagreb Faculty of Science, Department of Biology Zagreb Croatia
Corresponding author
Domijan, Ana‐Marija
Venue
Biomedical Chromatography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-30
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
41-46
ISSN
  • 0269-3879 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0801
OpenAlex
W1544314093
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomedical Chromatography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
malondialdehyde, lipid peroxidation, HPLC-fluorescence detection, method validation, human plasma, oxidative stress biomarkers, clinical laboratory testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Humans, Liver, Malondialdehyde, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Thiobarbiturates, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review