Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Plasma levels, heart rate, and blood pressure after intravenous, oral, and aerosol administration of reproterol in man

Hageman, R. J. J., De Zeeuw, R. A., Greving, J. E., Krann, J. J., Koëter, G. H.·1988·Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition

Abstract

Three healthy volunteers received single doses of reproterol (D 1959) by means of intravenous infusion, oral and aerosol application, respectively. Administrations were separated by at least 1 week. Plasma levels were measured by means of high performance liquid chromatography. After infusion, plasma levels showed a steep decline, indicative for a rapid distribution. Even though relatively large amounts of drug were given (up to 540 μg), this phenomenon caused reproterol levels to drop to values near or below the limit of reliable quantitation (1 ng ml−1) within 60 to 90 min. After oral administration of one or two tablets (containing 20 mg reproterol. HC1 per tablet), a very short lag time could be observed, indicating fast absorption. After one tablet, plasma level maxima (of plateau‐type) were 5.6 ng ml−1 and 2.3 ng ml−1 in two subjects, respectively. After two tablets, plateau level maxima around 18 ng ml−1 and 9 ng ml−1 were found, respectively. After inhalation of a metered aerosol (two puffs of 500 μg each) the drug appeared in plasma within minutes, albeit at very low levels, and usually remained detectable at the sub‐nanogram level during the time of the experiment (2 h). Due to the very low levels and to some oscillations in the plasma concentration‐time curves, a detailed pharmacokinetic assessment could not be carried out. Effects on heart rate and blood pressure were negligible. Only during the infusion of high doses (540 μg) was there an increase in heart rate of about 50 to 120 beats min−1. Other side‐effects were also negligible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bod.2510090308

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Klingler K. H., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 4
  2. Habersang S., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 14
  3. Habersang S., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 22
  4. Bateman J. R. M., 1979, Clin. Trials J., 16, 37
  5. Diewitz M., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 66
  6. 10.1159/000194093 · doi:10.1159/000194093
  7. 10.1055/s-0028-1104943 · doi:10.1055/s-0028-1104943
  8. Pines A., 1978, Clin. Trials J., 15, 127
  9. Tabori D., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 55
  10. Zecevi D., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 53
  11. Laggner A., 1981, Therapiewoche, 31, 6760
  12. Jansen W., 1982, Intensivmed., 19, 245
  13. Niebch G., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 37
  14. Niebch G., 1978, Arzneim‐Forsch., 28, 765
  15. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)84427-8 · doi:10.1016/s0378-4347(00)84427-8
  16. J. G.Leferink Ph.D. Thesis State University Utrecht (1979).
  17. Rominger K. L., 1972, Arzneim‐Forsch., 22, 1190
  18. Mándi A., 1977, Arzneim‐Forsch., 27, 60

Metadata

Authors
Hageman, R. J. J., De Zeeuw, R. A., Greving, J. E., Krann, J. J., & Koëter, G. H.
Venue
Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-05
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
301-314
ISSN
  • 0142-2782
  • 1099-081X
Cited by
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma levels, heart rate, and blood pressure after intravenous, oral, and aerosol administration of reproterol in man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bod.2510090308
The paper
Hageman, R. J. J., De Zeeuw, R. A., Greving, J. E., Krann, J. J., & Koëter, G. H. (1988). Plasma levels, heart rate, and blood pressure after intravenous, oral, and aerosol administration of reproterol in man. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition. https://doi.org/10.1002/bod.2510090308

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.